Evaluation of Energy Intake Assessed by the Food Frequency Questionnaire for Japanese Athletes (FFQJA) Using the Doubly Labeled Water Method

Energy intake assessed using the food frequency questionnaire for Japanese athletes (FFQJA) was evaluated with the doubly labeled water method. The subjects (n=10) were recruited from a male track and field team in one university. The average total energy intake assessed using the FFQJA was 2,662 (standard deviation: 445) kcal, and the average total energy expenditure assessed using the doubly labeled water method was 3,149 (337) kcal. The FFQJA estimate of total energy intake was 486 (897) kcal lower than the total energy expenditure corrected for changes in body weight. A percentage difference between total energy intake and corrected total energy expenditure was −10.3% on average. No significant difference was found between energy intake and corrected energy expenditure. However, Kendall’s τb and weighted Kappa suggested poor agreement at the individual level. Bland–Altman plot analysis suggested that there was no significant relation between differences in total energy intake and corrected total energy expenditure and average of total energy intake and corrected total energy expenditure (r=−0.493, p=0.147). Because the present study examined only a small number of participants and all of whom were male track and field athletes from the same team, future studies will be needed to clarify the generalizability of these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.72.256
Primary Topic
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Energy Intake Assessed by the Food Frequency Questionnaire for Japanese Athletes (FFQJA) Using the Doubly Labeled Water Method

Norimitsu Kinoshita, Kazuko ISHIKAWA-TAKATA, Natsume OSAKO, Ryoka SUZAKI
Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
article

Evaluation of Energy Intake Assessed by the Food Frequency Questionnaire for Japanese Athletes (FFQJA) Using the Doubly Labeled Water Method

Norimitsu Kinoshita, Kazuko ISHIKAWA-TAKATA, Natsume OSAKO, Ryoka SUZAKI
article en

Abstract

Energy intake assessed using the food frequency questionnaire for Japanese athletes (FFQJA) was evaluated with the doubly labeled water method. The subjects (n=10) were recruited from a male track and field team in one university. The average total energy intake assessed using the FFQJA was 2,662 (standard deviation: 445) kcal, and the average total energy expenditure assessed using the doubly labeled water method was 3,149 (337) kcal. The FFQJA estimate of total energy intake was 486 (897) kcal lower than the total energy expenditure corrected for changes in body weight. A percentage difference between total energy intake and corrected total energy expenditure was −10.3% on average. No significant difference was found between energy intake and corrected energy expenditure. However, Kendall’s τb and weighted Kappa suggested poor agreement at the individual level. Bland–Altman plot analysis suggested that there was no significant relation between differences in total energy intake and corrected total energy expenditure and average of total energy intake and corrected total energy expenditure (r=−0.493, p=0.147). Because the present study examined only a small number of participants and all of whom were male track and field athletes from the same team, future studies will be needed to clarify the generalizability of these findings.

Journal of Nutritional Science and VitaminologyVol. 72(3)
Tokyo University of Agriculture (JP), Toyo University (JP), Hosei University (JP)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.