Leaf Size in Conifers: Global Associations With Climate and Evolutionary History

Global analyses of leaf size suggest that large leaves predominate in favourably warm and wet climates, and small leaves occur at climatic extremes. However, these patterns are dominated by data from angiosperms and may obscure drivers of leaf size variation in older, less speciose groups, such as conifers. Here we employ a novel modelling framework, multi-response phylogenetic mixed models (MRPMM), that identifies trait correlations at both phylogenetic and phylogenetically independent levels to investigate how climate influences leaf size evolution across conifers. We show overall patterns for all conifers and focus on three groups with distinctive leaf architectures: scale-leaved Cupressaceae, needle-leaved Pinus and broad-leaved Podocarpus. We found moderate to strong phylogenetic signal in conifer leaf and climate niche traits. Phylogenetic relationships explained most of the association between leaf size and climate, with temperature revealed as a stronger driver than dry season precipitation, indicating deep-time co-evolutionary associations. These patterns reflect trade-offs associated with leaf hydraulic architecture under contrasting selection pressures. In single-veined leaves, lateral water transport and thus leaf width is constrained, yet this narrow leaf form can be advantageous for survival under climatic extremes such as drought and freezing. In contrast, anatomical innovations (like accessory transfusion tissue in Podocarpus) allow for broader leaves which are favourable in competitive environments, while also potentially making leaves more vulnerable to climate extremes. Our results support previous evidence for phylogenetic niche conservatism in conifers, where species tend to track their ancestral climatic preferences rather than adapting to new environments. This conservatism, likely controlled by leaf hydraulic architecture, results in strong evolutionary constraints on current bioclimatic distributions and potential responses to changing climates in conifers. This study also highlights the importance of considering phylogenetic impacts on functional trait evolution, especially in evolutionarily conservative groups like conifers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Change Biology
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70953
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leaf Size in Conifers: Global Associations With Climate and Evolutionary History

Matilda J. M. Brown, Ben Halliwell, Timothy J. Brodribb, Gregory J. Jordan et al.
Global Change Biology
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Leaf Size in Conifers: Global Associations With Climate and Evolutionary History

Matilda J. M. Brown, Ben Halliwell, Timothy J. Brodribb, Gregory J. Jordan, Kate M. Johnson, Katya I. Bandow
article en

Abstract

Global analyses of leaf size suggest that large leaves predominate in favourably warm and wet climates, and small leaves occur at climatic extremes. However, these patterns are dominated by data from angiosperms and may obscure drivers of leaf size variation in older, less speciose groups, such as conifers. Here we employ a novel modelling framework, multi-response phylogenetic mixed models (MRPMM), that identifies trait correlations at both phylogenetic and phylogenetically independent levels to investigate how climate influences leaf size evolution across conifers. We show overall patterns for all conifers and focus on three groups with distinctive leaf architectures: scale-leaved Cupressaceae, needle-leaved Pinus and broad-leaved Podocarpus. We found moderate to strong phylogenetic signal in conifer leaf and climate niche traits. Phylogenetic relationships explained most of the association between leaf size and climate, with temperature revealed as a stronger driver than dry season precipitation, indicating deep-time co-evolutionary associations. These patterns reflect trade-offs associated with leaf hydraulic architecture under contrasting selection pressures. In single-veined leaves, lateral water transport and thus leaf width is constrained, yet this narrow leaf form can be advantageous for survival under climatic extremes such as drought and freezing. In contrast, anatomical innovations (like accessory transfusion tissue in Podocarpus) allow for broader leaves which are favourable in competitive environments, while also potentially making leaves more vulnerable to climate extremes. Our results support previous evidence for phylogenetic niche conservatism in conifers, where species tend to track their ancestral climatic preferences rather than adapting to new environments. This conservatism, likely controlled by leaf hydraulic architecture, results in strong evolutionary constraints on current bioclimatic distributions and potential responses to changing climates in conifers. This study also highlights the importance of considering phylogenetic impacts on functional trait evolution, especially in evolutionarily conservative groups like conifers.

Global Change BiologyVol. 32(7)
University of Tasmania (AU), Australian Research Council (AU), Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (GB), Centre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications (ES), ARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture (AU)
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.