Evaluating the Use of Augmented Reality and 2D Interfaces for Diagnosing IoT-based Habitable Smart Spaces by Non-Expert Users EICS022

Smart space automation has, for decades, proposed a vision for enhancing the quality of human life. The Internet of Things (IoT) is one of the technologies addressing challenges and automating tasks that were once solely dependent on human intervention. However, what happens if an IoT system goes into a fault state? How can field-service technicians and even moderately tech-literate end-users without prior system knowledge diagnose and fix problems? In this paper, we investigate how different interface paradigms support diagnostic tasks in such scenarios, by presenting an Augmented Reality-based diagnostic tool and comparing it against a traditional 2D diagnostic desktop interface in a controlled user evaluation (n=25). We find that participants using the situated and embodied AR system complete tasks faster, task accuracy remains similar across interfaces and that the AR-based system is associated with higher physical demand. We interpret these findings as reflecting trade-offs between situated and embodied AR interfaces and symbolic 2D interfaces, and discuss implications for the design of diagnostic tools in smart space environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3816774
Primary Topic
Augmented Reality Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Use of Augmented Reality and 2D Interfaces for Diagnosing IoT-based Habitable Smart Spaces by Non-Expert Users EICS022

Andreas Komninos, Ioulia Simou, I. Kanellopoulos
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Augmented Reality Applications
article

Evaluating the Use of Augmented Reality and 2D Interfaces for Diagnosing IoT-based Habitable Smart Spaces by Non-Expert Users EICS022

Andreas Komninos, Ioulia Simou, I. Kanellopoulos
article en

Abstract

Smart space automation has, for decades, proposed a vision for enhancing the quality of human life. The Internet of Things (IoT) is one of the technologies addressing challenges and automating tasks that were once solely dependent on human intervention. However, what happens if an IoT system goes into a fault state? How can field-service technicians and even moderately tech-literate end-users without prior system knowledge diagnose and fix problems? In this paper, we investigate how different interface paradigms support diagnostic tasks in such scenarios, by presenting an Augmented Reality-based diagnostic tool and comparing it against a traditional 2D diagnostic desktop interface in a controlled user evaluation (n=25). We find that participants using the situated and embodied AR system complete tasks faster, task accuracy remains similar across interfaces and that the AR-based system is associated with higher physical demand. We interpret these findings as reflecting trade-offs between situated and embodied AR interfaces and symbolic 2D interfaces, and discuss implications for the design of diagnostic tools in smart space environments.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 10(4)
University of Patras (GR), Institute of Informatics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Augmented Reality Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.