Severe maternal and neonatal morbidity or mortality in forceps versus cesarean birth in the second stage of labor: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Approximately one in four first-time mothers reach the second stage of labor but cannot have a spontaneous vaginal birth, necessitating an intervention such as forceps to facilitate birth. OBJECTIVE: This study synthesizes evidence comparing severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and neonatal morbidity or mortality (SNMM) following forceps and cesarean birth (CB) in the second stage of labor. METHOD: Four databases were searched from database inception to May 30, 2023. Original studies comparing SMM or SNMM among individuals with an attempted forceps birth versus second stage CB were included. Meta-analyses were conducted using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model and the risk ratio (RR) was used as an effect measure with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: After screening 945 articles, a total of 13 cohort studies encompassing 52 192 individuals were included. Four studies with 34 131 total individuals provided data on SMM. The incidence of SMM was 2.6% with attempted forceps versus 3.7% with second-stage CB (pooled RR of 0.83, 95% CI 0.64, 1.07). Six studies with a total of 36 135 individuals provided data on SNMM. The incidence of SNMM was 4.5% with forceps versus 2.1% with second stage CB (pooled RR of 1.34, 95% CI 0.90, 2.00). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of attempted forceps on SMM and SNMM due to moderate or serious risk of bias, inconsistency, and heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Risks of SMM and SNMM are unclear after forceps and second stage CB and the choice between operative interventions should depend on the clinical scenario. Our study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42023387112) on January 2, 2023.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.71152
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Severe maternal and neonatal morbidity or mortality in forceps versus cesarean birth in the second stage of labor: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abirami Kirubarajan, Irina Oltean, Giulia M. Muraca
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Severe maternal and neonatal morbidity or mortality in forceps versus cesarean birth in the second stage of labor: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abirami Kirubarajan, Irina Oltean, Giulia M. Muraca
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately one in four first-time mothers reach the second stage of labor but cannot have a spontaneous vaginal birth, necessitating an intervention such as forceps to facilitate birth. OBJECTIVE: This study synthesizes evidence comparing severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and neonatal morbidity or mortality (SNMM) following forceps and cesarean birth (CB) in the second stage of labor. METHOD: Four databases were searched from database inception to May 30, 2023. Original studies comparing SMM or SNMM among individuals with an attempted forceps birth versus second stage CB were included. Meta-analyses were conducted using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model and the risk ratio (RR) was used as an effect measure with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: After screening 945 articles, a total of 13 cohort studies encompassing 52 192 individuals were included. Four studies with 34 131 total individuals provided data on SMM. The incidence of SMM was 2.6% with attempted forceps versus 3.7% with second-stage CB (pooled RR of 0.83, 95% CI 0.64, 1.07). Six studies with a total of 36 135 individuals provided data on SNMM. The incidence of SNMM was 4.5% with forceps versus 2.1% with second stage CB (pooled RR of 1.34, 95% CI 0.90, 2.00). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of attempted forceps on SMM and SNMM due to moderate or serious risk of bias, inconsistency, and heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Risks of SMM and SNMM are unclear after forceps and second stage CB and the choice between operative interventions should depend on the clinical scenario. Our study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42023387112) on January 2, 2023.

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Karolinska Institutet (SE), Impact (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.