Carpal Tunnel Release Using Ultrasound Guidance: Two-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial Within the Military

Purpose The primary objective was to compare the short-term (1-month) and long-term (2-year) outcomes of carpal tunnel release (CTR) using ultrasound guidance (CTR-US) to mini-open CTR (mOCTR) within the United States military population. Methods This single-site, prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled military beneficiaries with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Participants were randomized to receive either CTR-US in the clinic procedure room setting or mOCTR. Demographics and patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) were collected at baseline and follow-up PROs out to 2-years postprocedure. The primary outcome was the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand at 1 month. Additional outcomes included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire – Symptom Severity Scale, Modified 2-item CTS Palmar Pain Scale, and adverse events (2-year window). Complete-case, intention-to-treat, generalized additive models (α = 0.05) were used to compare PROs between groups. Results Forty-one participants (58.5% women, 49.5 ± 14.4 years, 41.5% active duty) were randomized and treated (21 CTR-US, 20 mOCTR) with 100% follow-up at 2 years. Both groups demonstrated improved Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (CTR-US: −8.2 ± 17.1; mOCTR: −8.4 ± 13.6), Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire – Symptom Severity Scale (CTR-US: −0.9 ± 0.8; mOCTR: −1.2 ± 0.7), and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (CTR-US: −1.1 ± 2.7; mOCTR: −1.1 ± 2.1) scores at 1 month with sustained clinically meaningful improvement out to 2 years. The CTR-US group reported less incisional pain and functionally limiting incisional pain during the first 4 and 3 weeks, respectively. One infection was reported in the CTR-US group. Conclusions Both groups had clinically meaningful improvements out to 2 years with respect to pain and CTS symptom reduction, as well as improvement in function. Compared to mOCTR, the CTR-US group reported less incisional pain and functionally limiting incisional pain in the early postprocedural period. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic 1B.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2026.101078
Primary Topic
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carpal Tunnel Release Using Ultrasound Guidance: Two-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial Within the Military

George P. Nanos, Nelson Hager, David Reece, Scott M. Tintle et al.
Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
article

Carpal Tunnel Release Using Ultrasound Guidance: Two-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial Within the Military

George P. Nanos, Nelson Hager, David Reece, Scott M. Tintle, Matthew E. Miller, Marin S. Smith, Xiaoning Yuan, J. Banks Deal
article en

Abstract

Purpose The primary objective was to compare the short-term (1-month) and long-term (2-year) outcomes of carpal tunnel release (CTR) using ultrasound guidance (CTR-US) to mini-open CTR (mOCTR) within the United States military population. Methods This single-site, prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled military beneficiaries with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Participants were randomized to receive either CTR-US in the clinic procedure room setting or mOCTR. Demographics and patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) were collected at baseline and follow-up PROs out to 2-years postprocedure. The primary outcome was the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand at 1 month. Additional outcomes included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire – Symptom Severity Scale, Modified 2-item CTS Palmar Pain Scale, and adverse events (2-year window). Complete-case, intention-to-treat, generalized additive models (α = 0.05) were used to compare PROs between groups. Results Forty-one participants (58.5% women, 49.5 ± 14.4 years, 41.5% active duty) were randomized and treated (21 CTR-US, 20 mOCTR) with 100% follow-up at 2 years. Both groups demonstrated improved Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (CTR-US: −8.2 ± 17.1; mOCTR: −8.4 ± 13.6), Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire – Symptom Severity Scale (CTR-US: −0.9 ± 0.8; mOCTR: −1.2 ± 0.7), and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (CTR-US: −1.1 ± 2.7; mOCTR: −1.1 ± 2.1) scores at 1 month with sustained clinically meaningful improvement out to 2 years. The CTR-US group reported less incisional pain and functionally limiting incisional pain during the first 4 and 3 weeks, respectively. One infection was reported in the CTR-US group. Conclusions Both groups had clinically meaningful improvements out to 2 years with respect to pain and CTS symptom reduction, as well as improvement in function. Compared to mOCTR, the CTR-US group reported less incisional pain and functionally limiting incisional pain in the early postprocedural period. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic 1B.

Journal of Hand Surgery Global OnlineVol. 8(5)
Madigan Army Medical Center (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US), The Geneva Foundation (US), Johns Hopkins Hospital (US)
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.