Elementary Educators’ Well-Being in Ci3T: Longitudinal Analyses of Experienced Implementers

This study extends prior inquiry examining educators’ well-being in the context of Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered (Ci3T) models, one type of integrated tiered system. We investigated educators’ well-being (self-efficacy, burnout) and implementation (treatment integrity, social validity) during the post-pandemic era among educators in schools with ≥3 years of Ci3T implementation. Findings indicated consistently high levels of treatment integrity and social validity (>80%) across 2 years. In terms of well-being, educators in this post-pandemic sample were comparable to a pre-pandemic sample of educators implementing Ci3T. Relative to a pre-pandemic comparison sample, educators reported higher and increasing efficacy for instructional strategies and classroom management, as well as lower depersonalization and higher personal accomplishment. Yet educators also reported elevated levels of emotional exhaustion. Results identified individual- and school-level predictors of implementation and efficacy. As with studies of educator well-being in integrated tiered systems prior to the pandemic, fall treatment integrity consistently predicted educators’ spring self-efficacy across domains. Results also showed educators’ fall efficacy for student engagement predicted higher spring treatment integrity, suggesting a reciprocal relationship between constructs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remedial and Special Education
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325261458754
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elementary Educators’ Well-Being in Ci3T: Longitudinal Analyses of Experienced Implementers

Kathleen Lynne Lane, Mark Matthew Buckman, Nelson C. Brunsting, Rebecca L. Sherod et al.
Remedial and Special Education
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

Elementary Educators’ Well-Being in Ci3T: Longitudinal Analyses of Experienced Implementers

Kathleen Lynne Lane, Mark Matthew Buckman, Nelson C. Brunsting, Rebecca L. Sherod, Grant Edmund Allen, Kandace Fleming, Wendy Peia Oakes, Nathan Allen Lane, David James Royer, A. Bernard, Amy Briesch, Sandra Chafouleas, Stacie Williams, Matthew B. Aschliman
article en

Abstract

This study extends prior inquiry examining educators’ well-being in the context of Comprehensive, Integrated, Three-Tiered (Ci3T) models, one type of integrated tiered system. We investigated educators’ well-being (self-efficacy, burnout) and implementation (treatment integrity, social validity) during the post-pandemic era among educators in schools with ≥3 years of Ci3T implementation. Findings indicated consistently high levels of treatment integrity and social validity (>80%) across 2 years. In terms of well-being, educators in this post-pandemic sample were comparable to a pre-pandemic sample of educators implementing Ci3T. Relative to a pre-pandemic comparison sample, educators reported higher and increasing efficacy for instructional strategies and classroom management, as well as lower depersonalization and higher personal accomplishment. Yet educators also reported elevated levels of emotional exhaustion. Results identified individual- and school-level predictors of implementation and efficacy. As with studies of educator well-being in integrated tiered systems prior to the pandemic, fall treatment integrity consistently predicted educators’ spring self-efficacy across domains. Results also showed educators’ fall efficacy for student engagement predicted higher spring treatment integrity, suggesting a reciprocal relationship between constructs.

Remedial and Special Education
Northeastern University (US), University of Connecticut (US), University of Louisville (US), University of Kansas (US), University of Wisconsin–Stout (US), University of Florida (US), Arizona State University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.