The Underestimated Role of Environmental Factors in the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Disease: Experience From a European Childhood Cancer Centre

BACKGROUND: Immunocompromised children with hematologic malignancies or undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are at high risk for invasive fungal diseases (IFDs). Reported incidence varies considerably due to heterogeneous diagnostic criteria, antifungal strategies and environmental conditions. Environmental preventive measures, although highly relevant, remain underrecognised determinants of IFD incidence. METHODS: This retrospective, single-centre trial included paediatric cancer or transplant patients at high risk for IFD treated before (Cohort 1) and after (Cohort 2) relocation of a paediatric cancer centre from a 1990s building to a state-of-the-art facility with improved environmental protection standards (observation periods: 56 and 12 months, respectively). Antifungal prophylaxis continuously followed local standards. IFD was diagnosed according to 2019 EORTC/MSGERC criteria. Primary endpoint was IFD incidence; secondary endpoints included prophylaxis use, IFD management and mortality. RESULTS: This study included 186 patients (Cohort 1: n = 140; Cohort 2: n = 46). Baseline characteristics were comparable between both cohorts. Adherence to prophylaxis standards exceeded 98%, with liposomal amphotericin B being the most common agent. In Cohort 1, 25 possible, probable, or proven IFD occurred, mainly pulmonary aspergillosis, whereas no cases were observed following implementation of environmental measures in Cohort 2 (17.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.002). Most IFD cases occurred in HSCT recipients. IFD was associated with increased mortality (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary paediatric cancer and transplant setting, environmental protective measures were associated with a marked reduction in IFD incidence, complementing consistent pharmacologic prophylaxis. These findings underscore environmental protection as essential for IFD prevention in high-risk paediatric populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mycoses
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.70204
Primary Topic
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Underestimated Role of Environmental Factors in the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Disease: Experience From a European Childhood Cancer Centre

Felicia Andresen, Tobias F. Feuchtinger, Brigitte Strahm, Stefano Malvestiti et al.
Mycoses
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
article

The Underestimated Role of Environmental Factors in the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Disease: Experience From a European Childhood Cancer Centre

Felicia Andresen, Tobias F. Feuchtinger, Brigitte Strahm, Stefano Malvestiti, Markus Hufnagel, Alexander Puzik, Carsten Speckmann
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immunocompromised children with hematologic malignancies or undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are at high risk for invasive fungal diseases (IFDs). Reported incidence varies considerably due to heterogeneous diagnostic criteria, antifungal strategies and environmental conditions. Environmental preventive measures, although highly relevant, remain underrecognised determinants of IFD incidence. METHODS: This retrospective, single-centre trial included paediatric cancer or transplant patients at high risk for IFD treated before (Cohort 1) and after (Cohort 2) relocation of a paediatric cancer centre from a 1990s building to a state-of-the-art facility with improved environmental protection standards (observation periods: 56 and 12 months, respectively). Antifungal prophylaxis continuously followed local standards. IFD was diagnosed according to 2019 EORTC/MSGERC criteria. Primary endpoint was IFD incidence; secondary endpoints included prophylaxis use, IFD management and mortality. RESULTS: This study included 186 patients (Cohort 1: n = 140; Cohort 2: n = 46). Baseline characteristics were comparable between both cohorts. Adherence to prophylaxis standards exceeded 98%, with liposomal amphotericin B being the most common agent. In Cohort 1, 25 possible, probable, or proven IFD occurred, mainly pulmonary aspergillosis, whereas no cases were observed following implementation of environmental measures in Cohort 2 (17.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.002). Most IFD cases occurred in HSCT recipients. IFD was associated with increased mortality (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary paediatric cancer and transplant setting, environmental protective measures were associated with a marked reduction in IFD incidence, complementing consistent pharmacologic prophylaxis. These findings underscore environmental protection as essential for IFD prevention in high-risk paediatric populations.

MycosesVol. 69(7)
University of Freiburg (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.