Randomized-controlled trial of sacubitril/valsartan and amlodipine combination in Japanese uncontrolled hypertensive patients (J-SAMIT)

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled study aimed to demonstrate a superior BP-lowering effect of sacubitril/valsartan (SacVal) and amlodipine (AML) combination therapy vs SacVal monotherapy in Japanese patients with grade Ⅰ/Ⅱ essential hypertension inadequately controlled with SacVal monotherapy. After 4 weeks of single-blind active run-in with SacVal 200 mg monotherapy, patients (n=717) with mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) of 140 to <180 mmHg were randomized and received SacVal 200 mg monotherapy or SacVal 200 mg in combination with AML (2.5, 5, or 10 mg) for 8 weeks. All SacVal/AML 200 mg/2.5 mg, 200 mg/5 mg, 200 mg/10 mg combinations achieved statistically significant, dose-dependent reductions in msSBP vs SacVal 200 mg monotherapy (treatment difference [mmHg] [95% CI]: -5.63 [ -8.01, -3.25], -12.94 [ -15.22, -10.67], -16.39 [ -19.01, -13.77], respectively; all p < 0.001). Treatment effects of all combinations were also statistically significant in 24-h ambulatory SBP (treatment difference [mmHg] [95% CI] vs SacVal: -6.48 [ - 8.79, -4.18], -14.18 [ -16.63, -11.73], -17.70 [ -20.24, -15.26], respectively; all p < 0.001) and BP control ( < 140/90 mmHg) rates (57.2, 72.5, 79.9%, respectively, vs 35.0% in SacVal with odds ratio [95% CI]: 2.16 [1.40, 3.33], 5.28 [3.31, 8.43], 7.23 [4.41, 11.86], respectively; all p < 0.001). Subgroup and waterfall plot analyses in msSBP demonstrated consistent BP-lowering effects across patient demographic and baseline characteristics. The safety profile of combination therapy was similar to that of SacVal with no new safety findings. These results demonstrated that combination therapy provided superior BP reduction with favorable safety and tolerability in Japanese patients inadequately controlled by SacVal 200 mg monotherapy. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, active controlled trial, sacubitril/valsartan and amlodipine combination therapy showed dose-dependent reductions in office and 24-hour systolic blood pressure and a favourable safety profile in Japanese patients inadequately controlled on sacubitril/valsartan monotherapy, supporting its efficacy and safety as a treatment option.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hypertension Research
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-026-02704-7
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Randomized-controlled trial of sacubitril/valsartan and amlodipine combination in Japanese uncontrolled hypertensive patients (J-SAMIT)

Sarfaraz Sayyed, Toshihito Kitamura, Hiromi Rakugi, Kazuomi Kario et al.
Hypertension Research
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Randomized-controlled trial of sacubitril/valsartan and amlodipine combination in Japanese uncontrolled hypertensive patients (J-SAMIT)

Sarfaraz Sayyed, Toshihito Kitamura, Hiromi Rakugi, Kazuomi Kario, Ankur Malhotra, Yukina Tanaka, Chiyo Ito
article en

Abstract

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled study aimed to demonstrate a superior BP-lowering effect of sacubitril/valsartan (SacVal) and amlodipine (AML) combination therapy vs SacVal monotherapy in Japanese patients with grade Ⅰ/Ⅱ essential hypertension inadequately controlled with SacVal monotherapy. After 4 weeks of single-blind active run-in with SacVal 200 mg monotherapy, patients (n=717) with mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) of 140 to <180 mmHg were randomized and received SacVal 200 mg monotherapy or SacVal 200 mg in combination with AML (2.5, 5, or 10 mg) for 8 weeks. All SacVal/AML 200 mg/2.5 mg, 200 mg/5 mg, 200 mg/10 mg combinations achieved statistically significant, dose-dependent reductions in msSBP vs SacVal 200 mg monotherapy (treatment difference [mmHg] [95% CI]: -5.63 [ -8.01, -3.25], -12.94 [ -15.22, -10.67], -16.39 [ -19.01, -13.77], respectively; all p < 0.001). Treatment effects of all combinations were also statistically significant in 24-h ambulatory SBP (treatment difference [mmHg] [95% CI] vs SacVal: -6.48 [ - 8.79, -4.18], -14.18 [ -16.63, -11.73], -17.70 [ -20.24, -15.26], respectively; all p < 0.001) and BP control ( < 140/90 mmHg) rates (57.2, 72.5, 79.9%, respectively, vs 35.0% in SacVal with odds ratio [95% CI]: 2.16 [1.40, 3.33], 5.28 [3.31, 8.43], 7.23 [4.41, 11.86], respectively; all p < 0.001). Subgroup and waterfall plot analyses in msSBP demonstrated consistent BP-lowering effects across patient demographic and baseline characteristics. The safety profile of combination therapy was similar to that of SacVal with no new safety findings. These results demonstrated that combination therapy provided superior BP reduction with favorable safety and tolerability in Japanese patients inadequately controlled by SacVal 200 mg monotherapy. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, active controlled trial, sacubitril/valsartan and amlodipine combination therapy showed dose-dependent reductions in office and 24-hour systolic blood pressure and a favourable safety profile in Japanese patients inadequately controlled on sacubitril/valsartan monotherapy, supporting its efficacy and safety as a treatment option.

Hypertension Research
Jichi Medical University (JP), Novartis (India) (IN), Novartis (Japan) (JP), Osaka Rosai Hospital (JP)
Novartis, Novartis Pharma
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.