Some concerns over the attribution of blame to non-consensual sexual deepfakes: A response to Patrone and Viola
Abstract In this commentary, I challenge Fabio Patrone and Marco Viola’s claim (in their 2026 article, Patrone, F., & Viola, M. (2026). Non-consensual sexual deepfakes as direct personal harm. Philosophy & Technology , 39 (94), 1–22) that their metaphysical approach to personhood provides a solid grounding for the attribution of blame to non-consensual sexual deepfakes Using two examples – The Case of Mistaken Identity and The ‘Stud’ – I aim to show that Patrone and Viola’s metaphysical approach is neither necessary nor sufficient for the ascription of blame to non-consensual sexual deepfakes.
Authors
- Garry Young (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0628-0931)
Institutions
- Monash Medical Centre (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Philosophy & Technology
- Published
- 2026-06-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-026-01131-3
- Primary Topic
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Monash University