HOW MUCH DO WE REALLY KNOW ABOUT THE IMPLICATIONS OF DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE FOR FUTURE HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE COSTS? ARTICULATING A RESEARCH AGENDA

Abstract Projections of health/social care spending highlight risks to future fiscal sustainability. This concern is based, in part, on six assumptions, which we argue are uncertain: (1). Populations will continue to age; (2). Health is a function of age; (3). Health/social care need is driven by health; (4). Health/social care spending is driven by need; (5). Inequalities are unimportant; (6). Increasing dependency ratios risk fiscal sustainability. We propose three hypotheses which reframe the debate: (1). Health/social care spending primarily results from political decisions on supply; (2). Prevention policies alone are unlikely to reduce fiscal pressures; (3). Fiscal sustainability is best achieved by combining prevention with decommodification and ‘realistic medicine’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
National Institute Economic Review
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/nie.2026.10098
Primary Topic
Global Health Care Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HOW MUCH DO WE REALLY KNOW ABOUT THE IMPLICATIONS OF DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE FOR FUTURE HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE COSTS? ARTICULATING A RESEARCH AGENDA

Neil Craig, Gerry McCartney
National Institute Economic Review
Global Health Care Issues
article

HOW MUCH DO WE REALLY KNOW ABOUT THE IMPLICATIONS OF DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE FOR FUTURE HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE COSTS? ARTICULATING A RESEARCH AGENDA

Neil Craig, Gerry McCartney
article en

Abstract

Abstract Projections of health/social care spending highlight risks to future fiscal sustainability. This concern is based, in part, on six assumptions, which we argue are uncertain: (1). Populations will continue to age; (2). Health is a function of age; (3). Health/social care need is driven by health; (4). Health/social care spending is driven by need; (5). Inequalities are unimportant; (6). Increasing dependency ratios risk fiscal sustainability. We propose three hypotheses which reframe the debate: (1). Health/social care spending primarily results from political decisions on supply; (2). Prevention policies alone are unlikely to reduce fiscal pressures; (3). Fiscal sustainability is best achieved by combining prevention with decommodification and ‘realistic medicine’.

National Institute Economic Review
Glasgow Caledonian University (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global Health Care Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.