HOW MUCH DO WE REALLY KNOW ABOUT THE IMPLICATIONS OF DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE FOR FUTURE HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE COSTS? ARTICULATING A RESEARCH AGENDA
Abstract Projections of health/social care spending highlight risks to future fiscal sustainability. This concern is based, in part, on six assumptions, which we argue are uncertain: (1). Populations will continue to age; (2). Health is a function of age; (3). Health/social care need is driven by health; (4). Health/social care spending is driven by need; (5). Inequalities are unimportant; (6). Increasing dependency ratios risk fiscal sustainability. We propose three hypotheses which reframe the debate: (1). Health/social care spending primarily results from political decisions on supply; (2). Prevention policies alone are unlikely to reduce fiscal pressures; (3). Fiscal sustainability is best achieved by combining prevention with decommodification and ‘realistic medicine’.
Authors
- Neil Craig (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7370-5541)
- Gerry McCartney (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6341-3521)
Institutions
- Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- National Institute Economic Review
- Published
- 2026-06-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/nie.2026.10098
- Primary Topic
- Global Health Care Issues
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00