Genetic population structure of red foxes <i>Vulpes vulpes</i> across a rural landscape: insights into population connectivity and spatial patterns

Human activities have shaped and are continuing to influence terrestrial landscapes, creating heterogenous, and often, fragmented landscapes. Generalist species, like the red fox Vulpes vulpes , show high flexibility in habitat use, and occur across the heterogeneous, anthropogenic landscapes of central Europe. Red foxes are therefore thought to form one continuous population with little genetic structure; however, studies about this are rare. To address this lack of understanding, we investigated population structure and relatedness of red foxes within and between different parts of southwest Germany, and estimated recent and past migration rates within the heterogeneous landscape. We used single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data of 126 individuals, genotyped at 81 loci, obtained by non‐invasive scat sampling from three distinct rural areas: 1) an agricultural plain, 2) a forested mountainous range, and 3) a forest‐farmland mosaic landscape. These areas differ in the predominant vegetation cover, average elevation, respective distance from each other, and local hunting pressure. Our results indicated that red foxes exhibit weak but consistent genetic structuring over a relatively small distance (i.e. 145 km). Migration rates did not reflect geographical distances. We also detected migration patterns stemming from (and between) two of the investigated areas, and also unidirectional migration patterns towards one area that match source–sink dynamics. Despite the apparent absence of migration barriers, hunting regimes could be driving the unidirectional gene flow even for an ecologically flexible species. Consequently, our results show that the (perceived) absence of obvious dispersal barriers does not necessarily imply genetically homogenous populations or random dispersal in mobile generalist species, instead formal investigations are necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Biology
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01596
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic population structure of red foxes Vulpes vulpes across a rural landscape: insights into population connectivity and spatial patterns

Florian Kunz, Niko Balkenhol, Manisha Bhardwaj, Gisela H. Kopp et al.
Wildlife Biology
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Genetic population structure of red foxes Vulpes vulpes across a rural landscape: insights into population connectivity and spatial patterns

Florian Kunz, Niko Balkenhol, Manisha Bhardwaj, Gisela H. Kopp, Thomas Alef, Cornelia Ebert, Robert Hagen, Janosch Arnold, Ilse Storch, Felicitas Oehler, L Scholz
article en

Abstract

Human activities have shaped and are continuing to influence terrestrial landscapes, creating heterogenous, and often, fragmented landscapes. Generalist species, like the red fox Vulpes vulpes , show high flexibility in habitat use, and occur across the heterogeneous, anthropogenic landscapes of central Europe. Red foxes are therefore thought to form one continuous population with little genetic structure; however, studies about this are rare. To address this lack of understanding, we investigated population structure and relatedness of red foxes within and between different parts of southwest Germany, and estimated recent and past migration rates within the heterogeneous landscape. We used single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data of 126 individuals, genotyped at 81 loci, obtained by non‐invasive scat sampling from three distinct rural areas: 1) an agricultural plain, 2) a forested mountainous range, and 3) a forest‐farmland mosaic landscape. These areas differ in the predominant vegetation cover, average elevation, respective distance from each other, and local hunting pressure. Our results indicated that red foxes exhibit weak but consistent genetic structuring over a relatively small distance (i.e. 145 km). Migration rates did not reflect geographical distances. We also detected migration patterns stemming from (and between) two of the investigated areas, and also unidirectional migration patterns towards one area that match source–sink dynamics. Despite the apparent absence of migration barriers, hunting regimes could be driving the unidirectional gene flow even for an ecologically flexible species. Consequently, our results show that the (perceived) absence of obvious dispersal barriers does not necessarily imply genetically homogenous populations or random dispersal in mobile generalist species, instead formal investigations are necessary.

Wildlife Biology
University of Freiburg (DE), University of Konstanz (DE), Photonik-Zentrum Kaiserslautern (DE), Institute for Biodiversity (DE), Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior (DE), Centre For Wildlife Studies (IN), Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt (DE), University of Göttingen (DE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.