Nab-paclitaxel or Paclitaxel Treatment for Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-arm Meta-analysis

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> Relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treatment has limited evidence-based options. Solvent-based paclitaxel (PTX) and albumin-bound nanoparticle paclitaxel (nab-PTX) are commonly prescribed though never comprehensively quantified. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis was conducted (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024592475). PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched for interventional or observational studies reporting PTX or nab-PTX monotherapy in relapsed SCLC. Primary outcomes were the pooled 3-month progression-free survival rate (PFS), 6-month overall survival rate (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease-control rate (DCR). Random-effects models generated pooled estimates; prespecified subgroup analyses compared Asian <i>versus</i> Euro-American cohorts, and PTX <i>versus</i> nab-PTX treatment. <h3>Results:</h3> Fifteen studies (11 retrospective and 4 prospective) comprising 631 patients met the eligibility criteria of the study. Pooled efficacy estimates were: 3-month PFS 39% [95% confidence interval (CI)=28-50%, I<sup>2</sup>=84%], 6-month OS 46% (95%CI=32-61%, I<sup>2</sup>=91%), ORR 16% (95%CI=12-21%, I<sup>2</sup>=51%) and DCR 51% (95%CI=41-61%, I<sup>2</sup>=83%). Grade 3 or higher toxicities were infrequent – neutropenia 18% (95%CI=11-25%, I<sup>2</sup>=89%) and peripheral neuropathy 2% (95%CI=0-3%, I<sup>2</sup>=0%). Among 45 patients with pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD), treatment-related ILD exacerbations were 17% (95%CI=6-28%, I<sup>2</sup>=0%). Asian cohorts demonstrated greater neutropenia (26% <i>vs</i>. 5%) than Euro-American cohorts. Efficacy and safety were similar between PTX and nab-PTX monotherapy. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> Despite substantial heterogeneity, paclitaxel-based regimens demonstrated modest but clinically meaningful activity with generally favorable safety profile in relapsed SCLC, highlighting them as a pragmatic salvage option. In patients with ILD, their use warrants caution due to the risk of ILD exacerbation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anticancer Research
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.18271
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nab-paclitaxel or Paclitaxel Treatment for Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-arm Meta-analysis

Ayami Kaneko, Hiroaki Fujii, Yukihito Kajita, Satoshi Nagaoka et al.
Anticancer Research
Lung Cancer Research Studies
article

Nab-paclitaxel or Paclitaxel Treatment for Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-arm Meta-analysis

Ayami Kaneko, Hiroaki Fujii, Yukihito Kajita, Satoshi Nagaoka, Nobuaki Kobayashi, Sachiko Matsumoto, Kohei Somekawa, Nobuyuki Horita, Shinya Matsushita, Yu Hara, Suguru Muraoka, Fangfei Yang, Sousuke Kubo, KOHEI EGUCHI, KATSUSHI TANAKA
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> Relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treatment has limited evidence-based options. Solvent-based paclitaxel (PTX) and albumin-bound nanoparticle paclitaxel (nab-PTX) are commonly prescribed though never comprehensively quantified. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis was conducted (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024592475). PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched for interventional or observational studies reporting PTX or nab-PTX monotherapy in relapsed SCLC. Primary outcomes were the pooled 3-month progression-free survival rate (PFS), 6-month overall survival rate (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease-control rate (DCR). Random-effects models generated pooled estimates; prespecified subgroup analyses compared Asian <i>versus</i> Euro-American cohorts, and PTX <i>versus</i> nab-PTX treatment. <h3>Results:</h3> Fifteen studies (11 retrospective and 4 prospective) comprising 631 patients met the eligibility criteria of the study. Pooled efficacy estimates were: 3-month PFS 39% [95% confidence interval (CI)=28-50%, I<sup>2</sup>=84%], 6-month OS 46% (95%CI=32-61%, I<sup>2</sup>=91%), ORR 16% (95%CI=12-21%, I<sup>2</sup>=51%) and DCR 51% (95%CI=41-61%, I<sup>2</sup>=83%). Grade 3 or higher toxicities were infrequent – neutropenia 18% (95%CI=11-25%, I<sup>2</sup>=89%) and peripheral neuropathy 2% (95%CI=0-3%, I<sup>2</sup>=0%). Among 45 patients with pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD), treatment-related ILD exacerbations were 17% (95%CI=6-28%, I<sup>2</sup>=0%). Asian cohorts demonstrated greater neutropenia (26% <i>vs</i>. 5%) than Euro-American cohorts. Efficacy and safety were similar between PTX and nab-PTX monotherapy. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> Despite substantial heterogeneity, paclitaxel-based regimens demonstrated modest but clinically meaningful activity with generally favorable safety profile in relapsed SCLC, highlighting them as a pragmatic salvage option. In patients with ILD, their use warrants caution due to the risk of ILD exacerbation.

Anticancer ResearchVol. 46(7)
Tianjin haihe hospital (CN), Yokohama City University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Lung Cancer Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.