Geopolitics Beyond Identity: Ukraine, Structural Exposure, and the Great-Power Trap

This paper develops a structural-digital interpretation of the Russia–Ukraine war beyond identity-based explanations. It argues that Ukraine should be understood as a sovereign state under conditions of structural exposure: a situation in which legal sovereignty, moral legitimacy, alliance expectations, military dependence, geographic vulnerability, energy corridors, narrative infrastructures, and great-power incentives became misaligned. The article introduces an IR3 vocabulary including structural exposure, the guarantor gap, peripheral entrapment, proxy-sovereignty paradox, narrative-logistical warfare, attrition reversal, leadership volatility, and strategic prudence. It argues that Russia bears legal and moral responsibility for the invasion, while also showing how alliance ambiguity, Western encouragement without enforceable protection, and Ukraine’s frontier position created a dangerous gap between legal entitlement and structural protection. International Relations Russia-Ukraine War Structural Realism Security Studies

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21043660
Primary Topic
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geopolitics Beyond Identity: Ukraine, Structural Exposure, and the Great-Power Trap

Osama S Qatrani
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
article

Geopolitics Beyond Identity: Ukraine, Structural Exposure, and the Great-Power Trap

Osama S Qatrani
article en

Abstract

This paper develops a structural-digital interpretation of the Russia–Ukraine war beyond identity-based explanations. It argues that Ukraine should be understood as a sovereign state under conditions of structural exposure: a situation in which legal sovereignty, moral legitimacy, alliance expectations, military dependence, geographic vulnerability, energy corridors, narrative infrastructures, and great-power incentives became misaligned. The article introduces an IR3 vocabulary including structural exposure, the guarantor gap, peripheral entrapment, proxy-sovereignty paradox, narrative-logistical warfare, attrition reversal, leadership volatility, and strategic prudence. It argues that Russia bears legal and moral responsibility for the invasion, while also showing how alliance ambiguity, Western encouragement without enforceable protection, and Ukraine’s frontier position created a dangerous gap between legal entitlement and structural protection. International Relations Russia-Ukraine War Structural Realism Security Studies

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.