MITIGATION OF HARMONICS IN THREE-PHASE GRIDS USING ACTIVE POWER FILTERS: SIMULATION-BASED COMPARISON OF IRP AND SRF METHODS

The increasing use of nonlinear loads in electrical power systems has made power quality issues more pronounced, particularly in industrial facilities and electric vehicle charging infrastructures. These loads inject high levels of harmonic currents into the grid, leading to distortions in the voltage and current waveforms, reducing energy efficiency, shortening equipment lifespan, and adversely affecting system stability. In this context, effectively suppressing harmonics and improving power quality have become critical requirements for modern power electronics applications. Active Power Filters (APF) are advanced power electronic devices capable of performing functions such as harmonic suppression, reactive power compensation, and system protection against sudden load changes. In this study, instantaneous reactive power (IRP) theory, Synchronous Reference Frame (SRF), and Space Vector Modulation (SVM)-based control strategies for suppressing harmonics caused by nonlinear loads in three-phase systems are comparatively examined. The aim was to analyze the harmonic suppression performance, transient response, system stability, and implementation convenience of each method in the MATLAB/Simulink environment. The simulation findings serve as a guide for selecting control strategies for active power filters. They provided a comparative evaluation of the performance of the IRP, SRF, and SRF-SVM methods. Although the IRP method provided the best THD value (0.53%) under low-load conditions, the voltage stability was poor owing to the high overshoot (120 V) and long settling time (600 ms). The SRF method offered superior dynamic performance with a very short settling time (50 ms) and strong stability; however, its THD values (3.45%–3.57%) were high. The SRF-SVM method, on the other hand, demonstrated a balanced performance in terms of THD (2.34%–1.96%), overshoot (40 V), and settling time (200 ms), providing an optimal balance between harmonic suppression and transient response. Therefore, the SRF-SVM method was identified as the most suitable control strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Middle East Journal of Science
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51477/mejs.1816938
Primary Topic
Power Quality and Harmonics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MITIGATION OF HARMONICS IN THREE-PHASE GRIDS USING ACTIVE POWER FILTERS: SIMULATION-BASED COMPARISON OF IRP AND SRF METHODS

Hakan Donuk
Middle East Journal of Science
Power Quality and Harmonics
article

MITIGATION OF HARMONICS IN THREE-PHASE GRIDS USING ACTIVE POWER FILTERS: SIMULATION-BASED COMPARISON OF IRP AND SRF METHODS

Hakan Donuk
article en

Abstract

The increasing use of nonlinear loads in electrical power systems has made power quality issues more pronounced, particularly in industrial facilities and electric vehicle charging infrastructures. These loads inject high levels of harmonic currents into the grid, leading to distortions in the voltage and current waveforms, reducing energy efficiency, shortening equipment lifespan, and adversely affecting system stability. In this context, effectively suppressing harmonics and improving power quality have become critical requirements for modern power electronics applications. Active Power Filters (APF) are advanced power electronic devices capable of performing functions such as harmonic suppression, reactive power compensation, and system protection against sudden load changes. In this study, instantaneous reactive power (IRP) theory, Synchronous Reference Frame (SRF), and Space Vector Modulation (SVM)-based control strategies for suppressing harmonics caused by nonlinear loads in three-phase systems are comparatively examined. The aim was to analyze the harmonic suppression performance, transient response, system stability, and implementation convenience of each method in the MATLAB/Simulink environment. The simulation findings serve as a guide for selecting control strategies for active power filters. They provided a comparative evaluation of the performance of the IRP, SRF, and SRF-SVM methods. Although the IRP method provided the best THD value (0.53%) under low-load conditions, the voltage stability was poor owing to the high overshoot (120 V) and long settling time (600 ms). The SRF method offered superior dynamic performance with a very short settling time (50 ms) and strong stability; however, its THD values (3.45%–3.57%) were high. The SRF-SVM method, on the other hand, demonstrated a balanced performance in terms of THD (2.34%–1.96%), overshoot (40 V), and settling time (200 ms), providing an optimal balance between harmonic suppression and transient response. Therefore, the SRF-SVM method was identified as the most suitable control strategy.

Middle East Journal of ScienceVol. 12(1)
Şırnak University (TR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Power Quality and Harmonics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.