Analysis and Synthesis of Dyadic Calibration Across Modalities - DSS V

This preprint provides the integrative synthesis of the theoretical and operational components developed across DSS-I through DSS-IVb. The paper demonstrates how the series forms a cumulative analytical architecture. DSS-I through DSS-III specify the organisation, regulation, and adaptive meta-regulation of dyadic systems, while DSS-IVa and DSS-IVb provide parallel quantitative and qualitative operationalisations that preserve the same system-level ontology. A central contribution is the cross-modal account of convergence and divergence. Agreement between quantitative and qualitative indicators may strengthen structural interpretation, but divergence is not treated as measurement failure. Instead, it may reveal representational lag, differences in accessibility across modalities, early-stage instability, or domain-specific miscalibration that has not yet propagated across the system. The synthesis also clarifies the causal and interpretive ordering of structure, strain, intent, and fairness. Intent attribution and moralised fairness are treated as downstream interpretive responses that become more prominent when shared structural mapping deteriorates. They are therefore not used as foundational explanatory primitives within the framework. The paper establishes inference constraints for empirical and applied use, including the distinction between structural diagnosis and interpretive authority, the requirement that structure precede normative interpretation, and the boundary at which antagonistic organisation means that the dyad can no longer be treated as a unified collaborative system. This contribution introduces no new ontology or validation hierarchy. Its purpose is to integrate the existing architecture and specify how its theoretical and measurement components should be interpreted together.