Safety and efficacy of PICC-ports in oncology patients: A retrospective cohort study from a Colombian tertiary care center
BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central catheter ports (PICC-ports) combine peripheral insertion with implantable reservoirs, offering reduced invasiveness compared to chest ports. Evidence from Latin America remains limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and device survival of PICC-ports in oncology patients at a Colombian tertiary care center. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 50 consecutive adult cancer patients receiving PICC-ports (January 2023-December 2024). All procedures were performed using ultrasound guidance and intracavitary electrocardiographic navigation under local anesthesia. RESULTS: Technical success: 100% (95% CI: 92.9%-100%). No early complications occurred. Late complications occurred in 4% of patients: one case of catheter-related thrombosis and one case of catheter dislodgement. Overall complication rate: 3.1 per 10,000 catheter-days (95% CI: 0.35-2.07). Median dwell time: 117 days. Catheter retention: 94.0% at 30 days, 89.2% at 90-180 days. CONCLUSIONS: PICC-port implementation achieved excellent safety outcomes comparable to international benchmarks, supporting its use as an alternative to chest ports in resource-constrained settings.
Authors
- Patricia Vélez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7502-1522)
- Mile Yohana Rodriguez
- Mario Miguel Barbosa Rengifo
- Ana Clarete
- Jonnathan Ocampo
- Fredy A Watts-Pajaro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4263-5277)
- Carlos Osorio
Institutions
- Fundación Valle del Lili (CO)
- Icesi University (CO)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Vascular Access
- Published
- 2026-06-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298261451301
- Primary Topic
- Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00