The dynamics of customer participation in service recovery: The roles of failure severity, quality signals, and responsiveness

In high-contact hospitality settings, service failures can disrupt encounters in ways that prompt customers to intervene. Drawing on control theory and signaling theory, we conceptualize customer participation (CP) as a solution-oriented behavioral response through which customers attempt to influence recovery when service delivery is disrupted. We examine how quality signals and frontline employee responsiveness shape the extent to which participation translates into recovery outcomes. Across five studies, we show that severe service failures can prompt solution-oriented participation, but this response is contingent on contextual conditions. Quality signals attenuate the likelihood that failure severity translates into participation by shifting perceived responsibility toward the firm, creating a conditional quality signaling paradox. Employee responsiveness strengthens the positive effects of participation once enacted, but cannot compensate when participation is not initiated. These findings advance an understanding of CP by distinguishing between participation initiation and effectiveness, with managerial implications for balancing quality signaling and responsive frontline behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Hospitality Management
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2026.104809
Primary Topic
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The dynamics of customer participation in service recovery: The roles of failure severity, quality signals, and responsiveness

Yelena Tsarenko, Agung Yoga Sembada, Isabella Maggioni, Cheryl Leo
International Journal of Hospitality Management
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
article

The dynamics of customer participation in service recovery: The roles of failure severity, quality signals, and responsiveness

Yelena Tsarenko, Agung Yoga Sembada, Isabella Maggioni, Cheryl Leo
article en

Abstract

In high-contact hospitality settings, service failures can disrupt encounters in ways that prompt customers to intervene. Drawing on control theory and signaling theory, we conceptualize customer participation (CP) as a solution-oriented behavioral response through which customers attempt to influence recovery when service delivery is disrupted. We examine how quality signals and frontline employee responsiveness shape the extent to which participation translates into recovery outcomes. Across five studies, we show that severe service failures can prompt solution-oriented participation, but this response is contingent on contextual conditions. Quality signals attenuate the likelihood that failure severity translates into participation by shifting perceived responsibility toward the firm, creating a conditional quality signaling paradox. Employee responsiveness strengthens the positive effects of participation once enacted, but cannot compensate when participation is not initiated. These findings advance an understanding of CP by distinguishing between participation initiation and effectiveness, with managerial implications for balancing quality signaling and responsive frontline behavior.

International Journal of Hospitality ManagementVol. 140
Murdoch University (AU), Monash University (AU), Swinburne University of Technology (AU), ESCP Business School (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.