Regulatory Challenges and Opportunities for Cell‐Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Pharmaceutical Development: A European and Global Perspective

Cell-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) attract growing interest as biologically active, acellular platforms for therapeutic and diagnostic use in regenerative medicine, immunomodulation, and drug delivery. While EV-based products advance into clinical development worldwide, their acellular nature maps non-uniformly onto pre-existing categories. In the European Union, the 2025 European Medicines Agency/Committee for Advanced Therapies (EMA/CAT) guideline clarifies that "not substantially modified extracellular vesicles" fall outside the current advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) definition, requiring case-by-case development within other medicinal-product frameworks. Conversely, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates exosome/EV products for disease treatment as drugs and biological products subject to premarket requirements, while other regions apply existing drug and regenerative-medicine-related instruments using jurisdiction-specific classification criteria. This heterogeneity creates challenges for regulatory positioning, quality assessment, comparability, and cross-regional clinical development. We critically examine the evolving landscape of EV-based therapeutics, focusing on regulatory, technical, safety, and ethical considerations from a global perspective. We argue EV-based products should be developed within existing medicinal product frameworks (e.g., biologics, ATMP-related instruments), provided regulatory tools are applied consistently, and operational grey zones (e.g., classification criteria, critical quality attributes (CQAs), potency strategies, and comparability) are identified for clarification. Without proposing normative frameworks, this work provides a state-of-the-art synthesis intended to support ongoing regulatory dialogue across regions. The discussion is relevant for international agencies such as the EMA, FDA, the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) of Japan, the World Health Organization (WHO), and the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH), as well as for scientific societies such as the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) promoting methodological convergence. By aligning scientific insight with regulatory awareness, this review supports advancing EV-based therapies toward safe, reproducible, and internationally credible clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jev2.70332
Primary Topic
Extracellular vesicles in disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulatory Challenges and Opportunities for Cell‐Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Pharmaceutical Development: A European and Global Perspective

Tania Limongi, Paola Milla, Barbara Stella, Silvia Arpicco
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
Extracellular vesicles in disease
article

Regulatory Challenges and Opportunities for Cell‐Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Pharmaceutical Development: A European and Global Perspective

Tania Limongi, Paola Milla, Barbara Stella, Silvia Arpicco
article en

Abstract

Cell-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) attract growing interest as biologically active, acellular platforms for therapeutic and diagnostic use in regenerative medicine, immunomodulation, and drug delivery. While EV-based products advance into clinical development worldwide, their acellular nature maps non-uniformly onto pre-existing categories. In the European Union, the 2025 European Medicines Agency/Committee for Advanced Therapies (EMA/CAT) guideline clarifies that "not substantially modified extracellular vesicles" fall outside the current advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) definition, requiring case-by-case development within other medicinal-product frameworks. Conversely, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates exosome/EV products for disease treatment as drugs and biological products subject to premarket requirements, while other regions apply existing drug and regenerative-medicine-related instruments using jurisdiction-specific classification criteria. This heterogeneity creates challenges for regulatory positioning, quality assessment, comparability, and cross-regional clinical development. We critically examine the evolving landscape of EV-based therapeutics, focusing on regulatory, technical, safety, and ethical considerations from a global perspective. We argue EV-based products should be developed within existing medicinal product frameworks (e.g., biologics, ATMP-related instruments), provided regulatory tools are applied consistently, and operational grey zones (e.g., classification criteria, critical quality attributes (CQAs), potency strategies, and comparability) are identified for clarification. Without proposing normative frameworks, this work provides a state-of-the-art synthesis intended to support ongoing regulatory dialogue across regions. The discussion is relevant for international agencies such as the EMA, FDA, the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) of Japan, the World Health Organization (WHO), and the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH), as well as for scientific societies such as the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) promoting methodological convergence. By aligning scientific insight with regulatory awareness, this review supports advancing EV-based therapies toward safe, reproducible, and internationally credible clinical use.

Journal of Extracellular VesiclesVol. 15(7)
University of Turin (IT)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Extracellular vesicles in disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.