When disease travels downstream: The effect of intravesical recurrences in patients treated for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Abstract Background Treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) depends on risk stratification and tumour characteristics. Kidney‐sparing surgery (KSS) is preferred for low‐risk disease, whereas radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the standard for high‐risk UTUC. Intravesical recurrences (IVR) are common after both treatment modalities, but their impact on survival remains unclear. Objective To assess the IVR rate and cumulative hazard following UTUC treatment and oncological outcomes based on the presence of IVR during follow‐up. Second, the relation between UTUC and IVR tumour grade in patients treated with endoscopic KSS (eKSS). Methods A single‐centre study, including non‐metastatic UTUC patients treated between 2010 and 2023. Analysis was performed in a cohort of patients without a history of bladder cancer. Results In total 164 patients were selected; 85 treated with eKSS, 79 by RNU. Overall, 91 patients (55%) developed an IVR, 53 (62%) after eKSS and 38 (48%) after RNU, during a median follow‐up of 33 months (IQR 11–72). eKSS‐treated patients showed a significantly higher cumulative hazard for IVR (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.42–0.95, p = 0.02). The CSS and MFS were comparable between patients with or without IVR during follow‐up. In patients treated by eKSS, we found IVR upgrading in 24% of patients treated with eKSS. Conclusions Patients treated by eKSS showed a higher cumulative hazard of IVR, without an impact on oncological outcomes. These findings support the use of kidney‐sparing approaches in well‐selected cases and highlight the need for proper follow‐up including the bladder and evaluate IVR preventive measures as intravesical instillations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BJUI Compass
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70225
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When disease travels downstream: The effect of intravesical recurrences in patients treated for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Orlane Figaroa, Joyce Baard, Felix J. Fris, R Jeroen A van Moorselaar et al.
BJUI Compass
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

When disease travels downstream: The effect of intravesical recurrences in patients treated for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Orlane Figaroa, Joyce Baard, Felix J. Fris, R Jeroen A van Moorselaar, Sanne J. Jonker, Guido M. Kamphuis, Adriaan D. Bins
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) depends on risk stratification and tumour characteristics. Kidney‐sparing surgery (KSS) is preferred for low‐risk disease, whereas radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the standard for high‐risk UTUC. Intravesical recurrences (IVR) are common after both treatment modalities, but their impact on survival remains unclear. Objective To assess the IVR rate and cumulative hazard following UTUC treatment and oncological outcomes based on the presence of IVR during follow‐up. Second, the relation between UTUC and IVR tumour grade in patients treated with endoscopic KSS (eKSS). Methods A single‐centre study, including non‐metastatic UTUC patients treated between 2010 and 2023. Analysis was performed in a cohort of patients without a history of bladder cancer. Results In total 164 patients were selected; 85 treated with eKSS, 79 by RNU. Overall, 91 patients (55%) developed an IVR, 53 (62%) after eKSS and 38 (48%) after RNU, during a median follow‐up of 33 months (IQR 11–72). eKSS‐treated patients showed a significantly higher cumulative hazard for IVR (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.42–0.95, p = 0.02). The CSS and MFS were comparable between patients with or without IVR during follow‐up. In patients treated by eKSS, we found IVR upgrading in 24% of patients treated with eKSS. Conclusions Patients treated by eKSS showed a higher cumulative hazard of IVR, without an impact on oncological outcomes. These findings support the use of kidney‐sparing approaches in well‐selected cases and highlight the need for proper follow‐up including the bladder and evaluate IVR preventive measures as intravesical instillations.

BJUI CompassVol. 7(7)
Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Cancer Center Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.