Comparative Effectiveness of Massage Gun and Myofascial Release Technique for Releasing Latent Trigger Points of Calf Muscle: A Randomized Clinical Trial

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Latent trigger points (LTrPs) in the calf muscle contribute to localized pain, increased pain sensitivity, and impaired movement. Massage gun (MG) and myofascial release (MFR) are used to manage LTrPs, but there's limited direct evidence comparing their effects. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effects of MG and therapist‐applied MFR on pain and ankle movement in individuals with calf muscle LTrPs. Methods This assessor‐blinded, single‐center randomized clinical trial included 60 participants with calf muscle LTrPs. Participants were randomly assigned to MG ( n = 30) or MFR ( n = 30). Both groups received 10 treatment sessions over 5 consecutive days (twice daily) with MG or MFR, followed by a standardized 20‐min ice application. Primary outcomes: Pain intensity was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), and pain sensitivity or pressure pain threshold (PPT) was measured with a digital algometer. Secondary outcome: active ankle dorsiflexion ROM (AADF‐ROM) was measured with an inclinometer. Outcomes were measured at baseline and post‐intervention. Results Both groups demonstrated significant within‐group improvements in pain intensity, pain sensitivity tolerance, and AADF‐ROM (all p = 0.001), with moderate‐to‐large within‐group effect sizes (r = 0.68–0.72). However, between‐group analysis showed significantly greater improvements in the MFR group compared with the MG group across all outcomes, including pain reduction (median change: −2.89 vs −1.69; Z = 6.05, p < 0.001, d = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.72–1.14), increased PPT (+1.64 vs +0.62 kg/cm 2 ; Z = 5.51, p < 0.001, d = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.63–1.03), and greater improvement in AADF‐ROM (+3.01° vs +1.02°; Z = 5.49, p < 0.001, d = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.54–0.96), indicating large between‐group effect sizes favoring MFR. Conclusion Both interventions effectively improved pain and ankle mobility in individuals with calf muscle LTrPs. However, therapist‐applied MFR yielded superior outcomes and may be the preferred intervention for this musculoskeletal condition. Trial Registration Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2023/08/056794).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Science Reports
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.72703
Primary Topic
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Massage Gun and Myofascial Release Technique for Releasing Latent Trigger Points of Calf Muscle: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Saruar Hossain Bhuiyan, Azharul Islam, Ehsanur Rahman, Abid Hasan Khan et al.
Health Science Reports
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Massage Gun and Myofascial Release Technique for Releasing Latent Trigger Points of Calf Muscle: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Saruar Hossain Bhuiyan, Azharul Islam, Ehsanur Rahman, Abid Hasan Khan, Sharmila Jahan, K M Amran Hossain, MA Hossain, KS Hossain, Dr. Md. Feroz Kabir, Md. Mafrohi Sattar, Farzana Sharmin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Latent trigger points (LTrPs) in the calf muscle contribute to localized pain, increased pain sensitivity, and impaired movement. Massage gun (MG) and myofascial release (MFR) are used to manage LTrPs, but there's limited direct evidence comparing their effects. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effects of MG and therapist‐applied MFR on pain and ankle movement in individuals with calf muscle LTrPs. Methods This assessor‐blinded, single‐center randomized clinical trial included 60 participants with calf muscle LTrPs. Participants were randomly assigned to MG ( n = 30) or MFR ( n = 30). Both groups received 10 treatment sessions over 5 consecutive days (twice daily) with MG or MFR, followed by a standardized 20‐min ice application. Primary outcomes: Pain intensity was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), and pain sensitivity or pressure pain threshold (PPT) was measured with a digital algometer. Secondary outcome: active ankle dorsiflexion ROM (AADF‐ROM) was measured with an inclinometer. Outcomes were measured at baseline and post‐intervention. Results Both groups demonstrated significant within‐group improvements in pain intensity, pain sensitivity tolerance, and AADF‐ROM (all p = 0.001), with moderate‐to‐large within‐group effect sizes (r = 0.68–0.72). However, between‐group analysis showed significantly greater improvements in the MFR group compared with the MG group across all outcomes, including pain reduction (median change: −2.89 vs −1.69; Z = 6.05, p < 0.001, d = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.72–1.14), increased PPT (+1.64 vs +0.62 kg/cm 2 ; Z = 5.51, p < 0.001, d = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.63–1.03), and greater improvement in AADF‐ROM (+3.01° vs +1.02°; Z = 5.49, p < 0.001, d = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.54–0.96), indicating large between‐group effect sizes favoring MFR. Conclusion Both interventions effectively improved pain and ankle mobility in individuals with calf muscle LTrPs. However, therapist‐applied MFR yielded superior outcomes and may be the preferred intervention for this musculoskeletal condition. Trial Registration Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2023/08/056794).

Health Science ReportsVol. 9(7)
Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed (BD), Jerash University (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.