Obvious Versus Subliminal Advertising for Digital Content Creators

ABSTRACT Content monetization on digital platforms, such as YouTube and TikTok, primarily relies on advertising and video views. Content creators typically employ two advertising strategies: obvious advertising and subliminal advertising. The former is a traditional and easily recognizable advertisement, whereas the latter is subtly integrated into the video content, and thus less perceptible to viewers. This study develops a game‐theoretical model in which creators strategically choose advertising strategies and the amount of advertising, while user viewing behavior is affected by both advertising and content quality. We examine the impact of market factors (such as the user satiation rates, creators' unit advertising revenue, and the cost of producing subliminal advertising) on video content creation and explore the ensuing implications for creator payoff and user surplus. Our analysis yields several novel insights. First, contrary to the conventional view that excessive advertising is primarily associated with low‐quality content, we find that high‐quality videos may also carry substantial advertising. Moreover, creators may reduce the amount of advertising even when higher unit advertising revenue is attainable, reflecting a strategic trade‐off between advertising and overall monetization. Second, subliminal advertising has a dual effect on content creation. While its heightened concealment may encourage creators to produce more high‐quality videos, it can also redirect effort toward advertising design rather than content improvement. Third, under certain conditions, higher unit advertising revenue benefits both the creator payoff and user surplus, indicating that profitability and user welfare are not necessarily in conflict. Finally, when the cost of designing subliminal advertising is moderate, competition among creators leads to excessive subliminal advertising and reduces creator payoff, consistent with the Tragedy of the Commons. In this case, obvious advertising dominates; otherwise, subliminal advertising is preferred. These insights offer actionable guidance for creators in choosing advertising strategies and determining the amount of advertising to balance monetization incentives and user experience on digital platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Managerial and Decision Economics
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.70096
Primary Topic
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Obvious Versus Subliminal Advertising for Digital Content Creators

Chunlin Luo, Jian Liu, Yang Yang, Xin Wu
Managerial and Decision Economics
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
article

Obvious Versus Subliminal Advertising for Digital Content Creators

Chunlin Luo, Jian Liu, Yang Yang, Xin Wu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Content monetization on digital platforms, such as YouTube and TikTok, primarily relies on advertising and video views. Content creators typically employ two advertising strategies: obvious advertising and subliminal advertising. The former is a traditional and easily recognizable advertisement, whereas the latter is subtly integrated into the video content, and thus less perceptible to viewers. This study develops a game‐theoretical model in which creators strategically choose advertising strategies and the amount of advertising, while user viewing behavior is affected by both advertising and content quality. We examine the impact of market factors (such as the user satiation rates, creators' unit advertising revenue, and the cost of producing subliminal advertising) on video content creation and explore the ensuing implications for creator payoff and user surplus. Our analysis yields several novel insights. First, contrary to the conventional view that excessive advertising is primarily associated with low‐quality content, we find that high‐quality videos may also carry substantial advertising. Moreover, creators may reduce the amount of advertising even when higher unit advertising revenue is attainable, reflecting a strategic trade‐off between advertising and overall monetization. Second, subliminal advertising has a dual effect on content creation. While its heightened concealment may encourage creators to produce more high‐quality videos, it can also redirect effort toward advertising design rather than content improvement. Third, under certain conditions, higher unit advertising revenue benefits both the creator payoff and user surplus, indicating that profitability and user welfare are not necessarily in conflict. Finally, when the cost of designing subliminal advertising is moderate, competition among creators leads to excessive subliminal advertising and reduces creator payoff, consistent with the Tragedy of the Commons. In this case, obvious advertising dominates; otherwise, subliminal advertising is preferred. These insights offer actionable guidance for creators in choosing advertising strategies and determining the amount of advertising to balance monetization incentives and user experience on digital platforms.

Managerial and Decision Economics
Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.