Lawyers and presidential lawfare: Trump’s law firm executive orders

This article considers the presidential lawfare campaign conducted by Donald Trump in the first few months of his presidency against numerous large law firms. After first briefly considering the evolution of the term ‘lawfare,’ the article briefly recounts the effort by Trump to punish law firms that represented political opponents or clients taking positions with which he disagreed. The theoretical conclusion is that the political value of the rule of law, understood as a limitation on the arbitrary exercise of power, is more fragile than we may have believed prior to the second Trump Administration. The judiciary has some role in protecting the rule of law, but without a robust commitment to that value by government lawyers and the legal profession more generally, the risk of arbitrary presidential power is a serious one indeed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Legal Ethics
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2026.2694287
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lawyers and presidential lawfare: Trump’s law firm executive orders

W. Bradley Wendel
Legal Ethics
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

Lawyers and presidential lawfare: Trump’s law firm executive orders

W. Bradley Wendel
article en

Abstract

This article considers the presidential lawfare campaign conducted by Donald Trump in the first few months of his presidency against numerous large law firms. After first briefly considering the evolution of the term ‘lawfare,’ the article briefly recounts the effort by Trump to punish law firms that represented political opponents or clients taking positions with which he disagreed. The theoretical conclusion is that the political value of the rule of law, understood as a limitation on the arbitrary exercise of power, is more fragile than we may have believed prior to the second Trump Administration. The judiciary has some role in protecting the rule of law, but without a robust commitment to that value by government lawyers and the legal profession more generally, the risk of arbitrary presidential power is a serious one indeed.

Legal Ethics
Cornell University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.