Glucose and Glutamine Define Independent Activation–Braking Metabolic States in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells

BACKGROUND/AIM: Cancer metabolism is often viewed as a cooperative reliance on glucose and glutamine; however, whether these nutrients can enforce discrete, non-overlapping metabolic states remains unclear. This study aimed to isolate nutrient-specific regulatory programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells were cultured under four distinct metabolic environments: glucose/glutamine nutrient-repleted (fed), dual glucose/glutamine deficiency, and isolated repletion of either glucose or glutamine. Groups were evaluated for integrated transcriptomic, metabolomic, and lipidomic profiles to identify only the non-redundant, nutrient-enforced architectures. RESULTS: The data show a mutually restrictive mechanistic state. Glutamine functions as a metabolic architect, restoring glycolytic enzyme transcripts (without lactate production), while inducing PDK1/3 which would decouple glycolysis from the TCA cycle. These changes are concomitant with a glutamine flux toward reductive TCA-driven lipogenesis, citric acid overflow, sterol synthesis (SREBF1/2), structural membrane expansion (phospholipids/sphingolipids) and the unique production of alanine as a nitrogen pool, independent of glycolytic flux. Conversely, glucose alone acts as the executor, licensing chromatin engagement, DNA replication, and mitotic progression. Glucose alone resolved ER stress, restored hexose-phosphate-derived glycosylation (mannose-6-phosphate), enabled lactic acid production, and diverted excess carbon into a triglyceride storage pool (>40% of lipids). Notably, each nutrient suppressed core elements of the other's program, revealing a reciprocal activation-braking system. Interestingly, ATP yield from glucose or glutamine alone were comparable, but not arbitrary; instead, aligned with the functional state of the cell. Glucose alone supported glycolytic phosphorylation and proliferative execution, as marked by lactate accumulation, whereas glutamine alone supported Krebs cycle-related phosphorylation, characterized by citrate accumulation and the maintenance of cellular structure and membrane infrastructure. CONCLUSION: Glucose and glutamine enforce a balance of two independent, reciprocally regulated metabolic states. This data provides a systems-level explanation for metabolic resilience in cancer and may lead to the identification of nutrient-specific targets for combination therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21873/cgp.20593
Primary Topic
Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Glucose and Glutamine Define Independent Activation–Braking Metabolic States in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells

Karam F. A. Soliman, Elizabeth Mazzio, Renee Reams, Jean Baptiste Lamango et al.
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
article

Glucose and Glutamine Define Independent Activation–Braking Metabolic States in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells

Karam F. A. Soliman, Elizabeth Mazzio, Renee Reams, Jean Baptiste Lamango, ZONELLE HANLEY, RAMESH B. BADISA
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Cancer metabolism is often viewed as a cooperative reliance on glucose and glutamine; however, whether these nutrients can enforce discrete, non-overlapping metabolic states remains unclear. This study aimed to isolate nutrient-specific regulatory programs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells were cultured under four distinct metabolic environments: glucose/glutamine nutrient-repleted (fed), dual glucose/glutamine deficiency, and isolated repletion of either glucose or glutamine. Groups were evaluated for integrated transcriptomic, metabolomic, and lipidomic profiles to identify only the non-redundant, nutrient-enforced architectures. RESULTS: The data show a mutually restrictive mechanistic state. Glutamine functions as a metabolic architect, restoring glycolytic enzyme transcripts (without lactate production), while inducing PDK1/3 which would decouple glycolysis from the TCA cycle. These changes are concomitant with a glutamine flux toward reductive TCA-driven lipogenesis, citric acid overflow, sterol synthesis (SREBF1/2), structural membrane expansion (phospholipids/sphingolipids) and the unique production of alanine as a nitrogen pool, independent of glycolytic flux. Conversely, glucose alone acts as the executor, licensing chromatin engagement, DNA replication, and mitotic progression. Glucose alone resolved ER stress, restored hexose-phosphate-derived glycosylation (mannose-6-phosphate), enabled lactic acid production, and diverted excess carbon into a triglyceride storage pool (>40% of lipids). Notably, each nutrient suppressed core elements of the other's program, revealing a reciprocal activation-braking system. Interestingly, ATP yield from glucose or glutamine alone were comparable, but not arbitrary; instead, aligned with the functional state of the cell. Glucose alone supported glycolytic phosphorylation and proliferative execution, as marked by lactate accumulation, whereas glutamine alone supported Krebs cycle-related phosphorylation, characterized by citrate accumulation and the maintenance of cellular structure and membrane infrastructure. CONCLUSION: Glucose and glutamine enforce a balance of two independent, reciprocally regulated metabolic states. This data provides a systems-level explanation for metabolic resilience in cancer and may lead to the identification of nutrient-specific targets for combination therapy.

Cancer Genomics & ProteomicsVol. 23(4)
Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.