Optimal screening practices for diabetic retinopathy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review to inform global screening guidance

Observational and interventional studies involving individuals aged <20 years with T1D were eligible. Major databases were searched from 1995 to 2024 and risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Sixty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, involving more than 200,000 participants. No randomized trials or direct comparisons of screening strategies were identified. The mean study prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was 9.5%, with higher prevalence reported in low- and lower-middle-income countries. Most cases occurred after five years of diabetes duration and after 11 years of age, although rare cases were reported earlier. Higher HbA1c levels (≥9%) were associated with increased retinopathy prevalence. Mydriatic screening improved detection compared with non-mydriatic approaches (11.5% vs 4.4%). Only six studies reported screening intervals, all from high-income countries. Sight-threatening retinopathy was rare and largely confined to older adolescents with longer diabetes duration. Findings support current recommendations for screening initiation and highlight the need for prospective studies, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2026.113385
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal screening practices for diabetic retinopathy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review to inform global screening guidance

Louise Puli, Kim C. Donaghue, Valentina Mancioppi, Sallianne Kavanagh et al.
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Optimal screening practices for diabetic retinopathy in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review to inform global screening guidance

Louise Puli, Kim C. Donaghue, Valentina Mancioppi, Sallianne Kavanagh, Claudia Piona, Stefano Passanisi
article en

Abstract

Observational and interventional studies involving individuals aged <20 years with T1D were eligible. Major databases were searched from 1995 to 2024 and risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Sixty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, involving more than 200,000 participants. No randomized trials or direct comparisons of screening strategies were identified. The mean study prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was 9.5%, with higher prevalence reported in low- and lower-middle-income countries. Most cases occurred after five years of diabetes duration and after 11 years of age, although rare cases were reported earlier. Higher HbA1c levels (≥9%) were associated with increased retinopathy prevalence. Mydriatic screening improved detection compared with non-mydriatic approaches (11.5% vs 4.4%). Only six studies reported screening intervals, all from high-income countries. Sight-threatening retinopathy was rare and largely confined to older adolescents with longer diabetes duration. Findings support current recommendations for screening initiation and highlight the need for prospective studies, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

Diabetes Research and Clinical PracticeVol. 238
University of Messina (IT), University of Huddersfield (GB), Diabetes Australia (AU), Children's Hospital at Westmead (AU), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (IT), Istituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini (IT), Monash University (AU)
World Health Organization
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.