Combined impact of microalbuminuria and obesity on cardiovascular outcomes in hospitalized heart failure patients: a cohort study

BACKGROUND: Microalbuminuria is proven to be an early indicator of poor prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF), while the role of obesity in predicting progression and outcomes of HF is faced with controversies. Evidence probing into the combined effect of microalbuminuria and obesity on cardiovascular outcomes in hospitalized HF patients is still lacking. METHODS: Consecutive patients hospitalized for HF were retrospectively enrolled from the Heart Failure Care Unit of Fuwai Hospital. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death and rehospitalization for heart failure. Patients were classified into four categories based on BMI and UACR: (1) Nonobese/nUACR, (2) Nonobese/hUACR, (3) Obese/nUACR, and (4) Obese/hUACR. RESULTS: Ultimately, 2228 patients with HF were enrolled. Cox regression analysis confirmed that microalbuminuria was independently associated with the primary outcome (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.01-1.62, p = 0.038). Obesity was independently associated with the primary outcome in main analysis (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.08-1.86, p = 0.013), but the association became insignificant after excluding NT-proBNP from covariates. Using Nonobese/nUACR as reference, Obese/nUACR and Obese/hUACR were related to an equally 61% increase in risk of the primary outcome (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.1-2.37, p = 0.015; HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.1-2.34, p = 0.014, respectively), higher than Nonobese/hUACR. Component analysis showed that Obese/hUACR was associated with a significantly increased risk of rehospitalization (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.06-3.4, p = 0.032) but not with cardiovascular death after adjustment. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) demonstrated nonlinear relationships of UACR elevation and risk (p < 0.001). In the subgroup of HFpEF, the association of Obese/hUACR with the primary outcome persisted (HR 3.81, 95% CI 1.87-7.76, p < 0.001, p for interaction = 0.241). CONCLUSIONS: Overlapping of obesity and microalbuminuria is relatively common (8.7%) in hospitalized HF patients. The coexistence of obesity and microalbuminuria is an independent risk factor for poor outcomes but in obese patients, the addition of microalbuminuria may not provide incremental prognostic information. The association with primary composite outcome appears to be primarily driven by rehospitalization rather than cardiovascular death. Subgroup findings in HFpEF population may be valuable but still warrant validation. (NCT02664818).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-05944-0
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combined impact of microalbuminuria and obesity on cardiovascular outcomes in hospitalized heart failure patients: a cohort study

Yu Zhang, Qiong Zhou, Mei Zhai, Guo A et al.
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Combined impact of microalbuminuria and obesity on cardiovascular outcomes in hospitalized heart failure patients: a cohort study

Yu Zhang, Qiong Zhou, Mei Zhai, Guo A, J I N G R U Zhang, Yan Huang, Xuemei Zhao
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microalbuminuria is proven to be an early indicator of poor prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF), while the role of obesity in predicting progression and outcomes of HF is faced with controversies. Evidence probing into the combined effect of microalbuminuria and obesity on cardiovascular outcomes in hospitalized HF patients is still lacking. METHODS: Consecutive patients hospitalized for HF were retrospectively enrolled from the Heart Failure Care Unit of Fuwai Hospital. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death and rehospitalization for heart failure. Patients were classified into four categories based on BMI and UACR: (1) Nonobese/nUACR, (2) Nonobese/hUACR, (3) Obese/nUACR, and (4) Obese/hUACR. RESULTS: Ultimately, 2228 patients with HF were enrolled. Cox regression analysis confirmed that microalbuminuria was independently associated with the primary outcome (HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.01-1.62, p = 0.038). Obesity was independently associated with the primary outcome in main analysis (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.08-1.86, p = 0.013), but the association became insignificant after excluding NT-proBNP from covariates. Using Nonobese/nUACR as reference, Obese/nUACR and Obese/hUACR were related to an equally 61% increase in risk of the primary outcome (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.1-2.37, p = 0.015; HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.1-2.34, p = 0.014, respectively), higher than Nonobese/hUACR. Component analysis showed that Obese/hUACR was associated with a significantly increased risk of rehospitalization (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.06-3.4, p = 0.032) but not with cardiovascular death after adjustment. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) demonstrated nonlinear relationships of UACR elevation and risk (p < 0.001). In the subgroup of HFpEF, the association of Obese/hUACR with the primary outcome persisted (HR 3.81, 95% CI 1.87-7.76, p < 0.001, p for interaction = 0.241). CONCLUSIONS: Overlapping of obesity and microalbuminuria is relatively common (8.7%) in hospitalized HF patients. The coexistence of obesity and microalbuminuria is an independent risk factor for poor outcomes but in obese patients, the addition of microalbuminuria may not provide incremental prognostic information. The association with primary composite outcome appears to be primarily driven by rehospitalization rather than cardiovascular death. Subgroup findings in HFpEF population may be valuable but still warrant validation. (NCT02664818).

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), National Health and Family Planning Commission (CN), China National Health Development Research Center (CN), Fu Wai Hospital (CN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.