Artificial Intelligence Performance Under Different Conditions in Answering China's Standardized Training Examination for Resident Physician in Radiology: A Comparative Analysis

ABSTRACT Background The capabilities of general‐purpose large language models (LLMs) on specialized medical examinations have not been systematically compared. To evaluate the performance differences among three LLMs—DeepSeek‐R1, ChatGPT‐o1, and Gemini‐2.0—in answering questions from China's Standardized Training Examination for Resident Physicians in Radiology, and to assess the impact of different questioning conditions (with/without answer choices, and the introduction of doubt) on model accuracy. Methods A total of 131 questions were analyzed at one time. The LLMs were subjected to two tasks (questions with/without answer choices). Each task included three conditions: no doubt, weak doubt, and strong doubt, with the latter two presented as follow‐up questions after the models' initial responses. Subjective evaluation was conducted using the 5‐point Likert scale. Results In both tasks, Gemini‐2.0 achieved the highest accuracy (0.763–0.809) and (0.595–0.679). In Task 2, all LLMs' accuracy was lower than in Task 1, but only DeepSeek‐R1 showed statistical significance ( p = 0.014). The introduction of doubt (weak or strong) did not significantly increase accuracy in Task 1 for any model. In Task 2, only DeepSeek‐R1 showed a slight increase in accuracy under doubt conditions. All LLMs performed significantly better on single‐choice questions than on multiple‐choice questions ( p < 0.05) and showed superior performance in case‐based questions vs. knowledge‐based questions. The subjective evaluation scores were 4.46 for DeepSeek‐R1, 3.92 for ChatGPT‐o1, and 3.83 for Gemini‐2.0. It was noted that ChatGPT‐o1 negotiated not to answer all questions at once and had missing responses. Conclusions LLMs exhibit variable proficiency in tackling radiology resident examination questions, with Gemini‐2.0 showing the highest overall accuracy. However, repeated self‐examination of LLMs through the introduction of doubt does not consistently or significantly enhance their performance on radiology‐related questions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health care science
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hcs2.70085
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Performance Under Different Conditions in Answering China's Standardized Training Examination for Resident Physician in Radiology: A Comparative Analysis

Xinming Zhao, Yanfeng Zhao, Xiaoyi Wang, Lin Li et al.
Health care science
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Artificial Intelligence Performance Under Different Conditions in Answering China's Standardized Training Examination for Resident Physician in Radiology: A Comparative Analysis

Xinming Zhao, Yanfeng Zhao, Xiaoyi Wang, Lin Li, Zheng Zhu, Yongming Zhang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The capabilities of general‐purpose large language models (LLMs) on specialized medical examinations have not been systematically compared. To evaluate the performance differences among three LLMs—DeepSeek‐R1, ChatGPT‐o1, and Gemini‐2.0—in answering questions from China's Standardized Training Examination for Resident Physicians in Radiology, and to assess the impact of different questioning conditions (with/without answer choices, and the introduction of doubt) on model accuracy. Methods A total of 131 questions were analyzed at one time. The LLMs were subjected to two tasks (questions with/without answer choices). Each task included three conditions: no doubt, weak doubt, and strong doubt, with the latter two presented as follow‐up questions after the models' initial responses. Subjective evaluation was conducted using the 5‐point Likert scale. Results In both tasks, Gemini‐2.0 achieved the highest accuracy (0.763–0.809) and (0.595–0.679). In Task 2, all LLMs' accuracy was lower than in Task 1, but only DeepSeek‐R1 showed statistical significance ( p = 0.014). The introduction of doubt (weak or strong) did not significantly increase accuracy in Task 1 for any model. In Task 2, only DeepSeek‐R1 showed a slight increase in accuracy under doubt conditions. All LLMs performed significantly better on single‐choice questions than on multiple‐choice questions ( p < 0.05) and showed superior performance in case‐based questions vs. knowledge‐based questions. The subjective evaluation scores were 4.46 for DeepSeek‐R1, 3.92 for ChatGPT‐o1, and 3.83 for Gemini‐2.0. It was noted that ChatGPT‐o1 negotiated not to answer all questions at once and had missing responses. Conclusions LLMs exhibit variable proficiency in tackling radiology resident examination questions, with Gemini‐2.0 showing the highest overall accuracy. However, repeated self‐examination of LLMs through the introduction of doubt does not consistently or significantly enhance their performance on radiology‐related questions.

Health care science
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), National Cancer Center (US)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.