Two Arms-one Assisted Port Extraperitoneal Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Simplified, Safe, Alternative Technique

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become the standard procedure for treating prostate cancer. Conventionally, RARP is performed using a three-arm, two-assistant-port transperitoneal approach, which may increase costs, pose a risk of intraperitoneal complications, and be less suitable for patients with prior abdominal surgery. To address these limitations, we developed a simplified and cost-effective two-arm, one-assistant-port extraperitoneal RARP technique. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> This technique evolved from a conventional transperitoneal three-arm, two-assistant-port system to an extraperitoneal three-arm, one-assistant-port system, and ultimately to an extraperitoneal two-arm, one-assistant-port configuration. Following Institutional Review Board approval, consecutive patients who underwent RARP performed by a single surgeon were enrolled. Baseline characteristics, number of dissected lymph nodes, estimated blood loss, operative time, and surgery-related adverse events were compared among groups. <h3>Results:</h3> Between September 2014 and May 2025, a total of 361 robotic prostatectomies were consecutively performed, including 28 transperitoneal and 333 extraperitoneal procedures. The extraperitoneal cases were further categorized into 175 three-arm and 158 two-arm procedures. Compared with the three-arm approach, the two-arm approach demonstrated comparable blood loss (<i>p</i>=0.646) and number of dissected lymph nodes (<i>p</i>=0.160), but significantly shorter operative time (<i>p</i>&lt;0.0001). A total of 10 surgery-related adverse events required radiologic or surgical intervention, including two cases of bowel ileus, one hemorrhagic shock, one ureteral obstruction, and six infected lymphoceles. Notably, both cases of bowel ileus occurred following the transperitoneal approach. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> The two-arm, one-assistant-port extraperitoneal RARP technique provides a simplified, safe, and cost-effective approach to robotic prostate surgery. Furthermore, this technique may serve as a practical transitional platform for surgeons adopting single-port robotic systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anticancer Research
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.18261
Primary Topic
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two Arms-one Assisted Port Extraperitoneal Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Simplified, Safe, Alternative Technique

Pei-Hsin Lee, Yuh‐Shyan Tsai, Hsin-Tzu Tsai, Tzong‐Shin Tzai et al.
Anticancer Research
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
article

Two Arms-one Assisted Port Extraperitoneal Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Simplified, Safe, Alternative Technique

Pei-Hsin Lee, Yuh‐Shyan Tsai, Hsin-Tzu Tsai, Tzong‐Shin Tzai, YEONG-CHIN JOU
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become the standard procedure for treating prostate cancer. Conventionally, RARP is performed using a three-arm, two-assistant-port transperitoneal approach, which may increase costs, pose a risk of intraperitoneal complications, and be less suitable for patients with prior abdominal surgery. To address these limitations, we developed a simplified and cost-effective two-arm, one-assistant-port extraperitoneal RARP technique. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> This technique evolved from a conventional transperitoneal three-arm, two-assistant-port system to an extraperitoneal three-arm, one-assistant-port system, and ultimately to an extraperitoneal two-arm, one-assistant-port configuration. Following Institutional Review Board approval, consecutive patients who underwent RARP performed by a single surgeon were enrolled. Baseline characteristics, number of dissected lymph nodes, estimated blood loss, operative time, and surgery-related adverse events were compared among groups. <h3>Results:</h3> Between September 2014 and May 2025, a total of 361 robotic prostatectomies were consecutively performed, including 28 transperitoneal and 333 extraperitoneal procedures. The extraperitoneal cases were further categorized into 175 three-arm and 158 two-arm procedures. Compared with the three-arm approach, the two-arm approach demonstrated comparable blood loss (<i>p</i>=0.646) and number of dissected lymph nodes (<i>p</i>=0.160), but significantly shorter operative time (<i>p</i>&lt;0.0001). A total of 10 surgery-related adverse events required radiologic or surgical intervention, including two cases of bowel ileus, one hemorrhagic shock, one ureteral obstruction, and six infected lymphoceles. Notably, both cases of bowel ileus occurred following the transperitoneal approach. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> The two-arm, one-assistant-port extraperitoneal RARP technique provides a simplified, safe, and cost-effective approach to robotic prostate surgery. Furthermore, this technique may serve as a practical transitional platform for surgeons adopting single-port robotic systems.

Anticancer ResearchVol. 46(7)
China Medical University (TW), An-Nan Hospital (TW), St. Martin de Porres Hospital (TW), National Cheng Kung University Hospital (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.