Exploring Eating Patterns and Cooking Habits Among Emerging Adult College Students to Inform a Pilot Meal Kit Program

ABSTRACT Introduction Emerging adult college students often experience poor diet quality (DQ) and rely heavily on ultra‐processed foods (UPFs), such as sugary beverages, salty snacks, sweet snacks, and other calorie‐dense, convenience foods. Meal kits, which provide pre‐portioned ingredients and simple recipes, may offer a practical strategy to support healthier eating among emerging adults, yet their relevance and feasibility in college settings remain poorly understood. This study aims to assess the health behaviors, needs, and preferences of the target college student population to inform the development and feasibility of a pilot meal kit program. Methods This exploratory, community‐informed research used a multi‐method approach implemented in two phases: (1) an electronic survey of undergraduate students assessing sociodemographics, eating patterns, and meal preparation habits, and (2) virtual focus groups exploring protein intake, cooking behaviors, and desired meal‐kit features. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and logistic regression models. Qualitative data were coded using inductive thematic analysis. Results Students ( N = 501) demonstrated low DQ (sHEI = 47.7 ± 10.0/100), and 33.7% reported low or very low food security. Higher UPF intake (OR = 1.14, 95% CI [1.02, 1.25], p = 0.015), more frequent cooking (OR = 1.31, 95% CI [1.02, 1.70], p = 0.037), and greater food insecurity (OR = 1.08, 95% CI [1.003, 1.16], p = 0.042) significantly predicted interest in meal kits, although effect sizes were small (Nagelkerke R 2 = 0.015–0.023). Qualitative findings identified key barriers to healthy meal preparation, including limited time, inadequate kitchen access and equipment, financial constraints, and dissatisfaction with campus dining protein options. Students perceived meal kits as convenient and customizable but expressed concerns about affordability. Conclusion Emerging adult college students face numerous barriers to healthy eating. Many view meal kits as a practical way to access convenient, nutritious meals. Affordable, culturally and economically tailored programs may help improve DQ and reduce reliance on UPFs. Findings support pilot testing a campus‐based meal‐kit program.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.70299
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Eating Patterns and Cooking Habits Among Emerging Adult College Students to Inform a Pilot Meal Kit Program

Emma Watras, Kayla Parsons, Kathryn Yerxa, Kelley Strout et al.
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
article

Exploring Eating Patterns and Cooking Habits Among Emerging Adult College Students to Inform a Pilot Meal Kit Program

Emma Watras, Kayla Parsons, Kathryn Yerxa, Kelley Strout, Jade McNamara, Noereem Z. Mena
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Emerging adult college students often experience poor diet quality (DQ) and rely heavily on ultra‐processed foods (UPFs), such as sugary beverages, salty snacks, sweet snacks, and other calorie‐dense, convenience foods. Meal kits, which provide pre‐portioned ingredients and simple recipes, may offer a practical strategy to support healthier eating among emerging adults, yet their relevance and feasibility in college settings remain poorly understood. This study aims to assess the health behaviors, needs, and preferences of the target college student population to inform the development and feasibility of a pilot meal kit program. Methods This exploratory, community‐informed research used a multi‐method approach implemented in two phases: (1) an electronic survey of undergraduate students assessing sociodemographics, eating patterns, and meal preparation habits, and (2) virtual focus groups exploring protein intake, cooking behaviors, and desired meal‐kit features. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and logistic regression models. Qualitative data were coded using inductive thematic analysis. Results Students ( N = 501) demonstrated low DQ (sHEI = 47.7 ± 10.0/100), and 33.7% reported low or very low food security. Higher UPF intake (OR = 1.14, 95% CI [1.02, 1.25], p = 0.015), more frequent cooking (OR = 1.31, 95% CI [1.02, 1.70], p = 0.037), and greater food insecurity (OR = 1.08, 95% CI [1.003, 1.16], p = 0.042) significantly predicted interest in meal kits, although effect sizes were small (Nagelkerke R 2 = 0.015–0.023). Qualitative findings identified key barriers to healthy meal preparation, including limited time, inadequate kitchen access and equipment, financial constraints, and dissatisfaction with campus dining protein options. Students perceived meal kits as convenient and customizable but expressed concerns about affordability. Conclusion Emerging adult college students face numerous barriers to healthy eating. Many view meal kits as a practical way to access convenient, nutritious meals. Affordable, culturally and economically tailored programs may help improve DQ and reduce reliance on UPFs. Findings support pilot testing a campus‐based meal‐kit program.

Journal of Human Nutrition and DieteticsVol. 39(4)
University of New Hampshire (US), University of Maine (US)
National Pork Board
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.