Treatment Trains vs. Single-stage Systems: Nutrient removal and economic tradeoffs of biochar-enhanced woodchip bioreactor systems

Biochar has been widely used as a soil amendment and also as a cost-effective adsorbent for pollutant treatment. Herein, we reexamined the system design and interactions between biochar and woodchip bioreactors (WBRs) to achieve synergies and minimize trade-offs, providing the first integrated assessment of treatment configuration, mechanistic interactions, and techno-economic performance in biochar-enhanced WBR systems. Three types of biochar-enhanced WBRs were evaluated: a single-stage system (biochar-woodchip mixture, W+B) and two treatment trains (WBRs followed by biochar systems, W-B, and biochar systems equipped with secondary WBRs, B-W). The results indicated that all types of biochar-enhanced WBRs exhibited simultaneous removal of nitrate and dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP). Single-stage W + B systems achieved the highest reductions in DRP and nitrate but resulted in the highest amount of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) leaching. Meanwhile, the treatment train design with a downstream biochar system effectively mitigated byproduct leaching from upstream WBRs while maintaining stable nitrate removal. DRP removal showed similar trends across the three types of biochar-enhanced WBRs, with a gradual decrease in removal efficiency over time. Microbial analysis revealed that the interaction between biochar and woodchip amendments selectively supported the growth of microbes that facilitate denitrification and organic matter decomposition, while reducing microbial diversity in W+B systems, which likely reflects system functional specialization towards denitrification. Furthermore, techno-economic analysis identified W-B systems as most cost-effective, achieving $187.9 ± 160.0/kg DRP and $5.7 ± 1.7/kg N per year. The relatively higher uncertainty associated with DRP removal costs was primarily attributed to variability in influent DRP loading and removal efficiency. In contrast, the W+B system, despite higher removal performance, exhibited higher unit costs due to decreased treatment capacity. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of infrastructure design and media interaction for advancing biochar application into WBRs to enhance their feasibility, effectiveness, and sustainability in water quality management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.148857
Primary Topic
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment Trains vs. Single-stage Systems: Nutrient removal and economic tradeoffs of biochar-enhanced woodchip bioreactor systems

Sophie Circenis, Hongxu Zhou, Haribansha Timalsina, Rabin Bhattarai et al.
Journal of Cleaner Production
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
article

Treatment Trains vs. Single-stage Systems: Nutrient removal and economic tradeoffs of biochar-enhanced woodchip bioreactor systems

Sophie Circenis, Hongxu Zhou, Haribansha Timalsina, Rabin Bhattarai, John W. Scott, Buchun Si, Wei Zheng, Peng Chen, Shuai Tang, Audrey Frost
article en

Abstract

Biochar has been widely used as a soil amendment and also as a cost-effective adsorbent for pollutant treatment. Herein, we reexamined the system design and interactions between biochar and woodchip bioreactors (WBRs) to achieve synergies and minimize trade-offs, providing the first integrated assessment of treatment configuration, mechanistic interactions, and techno-economic performance in biochar-enhanced WBR systems. Three types of biochar-enhanced WBRs were evaluated: a single-stage system (biochar-woodchip mixture, W+B) and two treatment trains (WBRs followed by biochar systems, W-B, and biochar systems equipped with secondary WBRs, B-W). The results indicated that all types of biochar-enhanced WBRs exhibited simultaneous removal of nitrate and dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP). Single-stage W + B systems achieved the highest reductions in DRP and nitrate but resulted in the highest amount of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) leaching. Meanwhile, the treatment train design with a downstream biochar system effectively mitigated byproduct leaching from upstream WBRs while maintaining stable nitrate removal. DRP removal showed similar trends across the three types of biochar-enhanced WBRs, with a gradual decrease in removal efficiency over time. Microbial analysis revealed that the interaction between biochar and woodchip amendments selectively supported the growth of microbes that facilitate denitrification and organic matter decomposition, while reducing microbial diversity in W+B systems, which likely reflects system functional specialization towards denitrification. Furthermore, techno-economic analysis identified W-B systems as most cost-effective, achieving $187.9 ± 160.0/kg DRP and $5.7 ± 1.7/kg N per year. The relatively higher uncertainty associated with DRP removal costs was primarily attributed to variability in influent DRP loading and removal efficiency. In contrast, the W+B system, despite higher removal performance, exhibited higher unit costs due to decreased treatment capacity. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of infrastructure design and media interaction for advancing biochar application into WBRs to enhance their feasibility, effectiveness, and sustainability in water quality management.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 571
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Kansas State University (US), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CN), China Agricultural University (CN)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Illinois Nutrient Research and Education Council
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.