Nectar Robbery by Native and Invasive Bumblebees Reduces Floral Rewards but Not Seed Production in <scp> <i>Desfontainia fulgens</i> </scp>

ABSTRACT Nectar robbery is common in hummingbird‐pollinated plants and is often assumed to reduce plant reproductive success by depleting floral rewards and disrupting pollination. However, its quantitative effects on plant fitness remain poorly resolved, particularly in systems where native and invasive nectar robbers coexist. We evaluated nectar robbery by the native bumblebee Bombus dahlbomii and the invasive B. terrestris in the hummingbird‐pollinated shrub Desfontainia fulgens in southern Chile. Flowering and nectar robbery were strongly synchronized, with robbery frequency peaking during maximum flower availability. Primary nectar robbing substantially reduced floral rewards: nectar standing crop in pierced flowers was approximately nine times lower than in intact flowers, whereas nectar sugar concentration showed only minor and statistically non‐significant changes. Small ants and flies were found inside the flowers, suggesting that these insects may act primarily as nectar thieves rather than effective pollinators. Their abundance was not significantly associated with corolla perforation. Floral visitation intensity differed among visitor species and foraging strategies, with bumblebees visiting more flowers per plant during nectar robbing than during legitimate pollination. However, these observations describe foraging modes rather than demonstrating that robbing itself caused a behavioral shift. The hummingbird Sephanoides sephaniodes was observed exclusively as a legitimate pollinator. Experimental manipulations showed no negative effects of nectar robbery on seed production when pollinators were present. Flowers exposed to pollinators produced substantially more seeds than flowers from which pollinators were excluded, confirming strong pollinator dependence. In contrast, both the probability of seed production and the number of seeds produced per flower were similar between flowers exposed to pollinators with and without nectar robbers. These results indicate that nectar robbery can markedly erode floral rewards without translating into reduced female reproductive output.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.73933
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nectar Robbery by Native and Invasive Bumblebees Reduces Floral Rewards but Not Seed Production in Desfontainia fulgens

Carlos E. Valdivia, José I. Orellana
Ecology and Evolution
Plant and animal studies
article

Nectar Robbery by Native and Invasive Bumblebees Reduces Floral Rewards but Not Seed Production in Desfontainia fulgens

Carlos E. Valdivia, José I. Orellana
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nectar robbery is common in hummingbird‐pollinated plants and is often assumed to reduce plant reproductive success by depleting floral rewards and disrupting pollination. However, its quantitative effects on plant fitness remain poorly resolved, particularly in systems where native and invasive nectar robbers coexist. We evaluated nectar robbery by the native bumblebee Bombus dahlbomii and the invasive B. terrestris in the hummingbird‐pollinated shrub Desfontainia fulgens in southern Chile. Flowering and nectar robbery were strongly synchronized, with robbery frequency peaking during maximum flower availability. Primary nectar robbing substantially reduced floral rewards: nectar standing crop in pierced flowers was approximately nine times lower than in intact flowers, whereas nectar sugar concentration showed only minor and statistically non‐significant changes. Small ants and flies were found inside the flowers, suggesting that these insects may act primarily as nectar thieves rather than effective pollinators. Their abundance was not significantly associated with corolla perforation. Floral visitation intensity differed among visitor species and foraging strategies, with bumblebees visiting more flowers per plant during nectar robbing than during legitimate pollination. However, these observations describe foraging modes rather than demonstrating that robbing itself caused a behavioral shift. The hummingbird Sephanoides sephaniodes was observed exclusively as a legitimate pollinator. Experimental manipulations showed no negative effects of nectar robbery on seed production when pollinators were present. Flowers exposed to pollinators produced substantially more seeds than flowers from which pollinators were excluded, confirming strong pollinator dependence. In contrast, both the probability of seed production and the number of seeds produced per flower were similar between flowers exposed to pollinators with and without nectar robbers. These results indicate that nectar robbery can markedly erode floral rewards without translating into reduced female reproductive output.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 16(7)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (CL), Millennium Nucleus of Ion Channel Associated Diseases (CL), Universidad de Los Lagos (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Plant and animal studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.