THE FAMILIARITY–ACTION GAP: TRUST, YOUTH CONTACT, AND THE LIMITS OF U.S. SOFT POWER IN TAJIKISTAN

This article examines how different mechanisms of U.S. soft power, particularly direct interpersonal contact and media exposure, shape Afghan and Tajik youths’ perceptions, trust, and intended engagement with the United States and international organizations. Using the first pilot survey collected from Afghan and Tajik youth residing in Tajikistan, the study quantitatively maps the relationships among youths’ perceptions, trust, and immediate and future actions. The findings indicate that trust is more strongly associated with intended future action than favorability alone, and that perception and trust are not significantly correlated. Direct interpersonal contact is more consistently linked to higher-commitment behavioral intentions than media exposure, which is more closely associated with familiarity and affective responses. These findings suggest the presence of a “Familiarity–Action Gap,” in which positive perceptions do not necessarily translate into active engagement. The objectives of this study are: (1) to examine how direct contact and media exposure relate to youth perceptions and trust, and (2) to test associations between perceptions, trust, and intended future actions. The study highlights the importance of trust-building mechanisms in contested soft power environments and suggests that interpersonal contact may play a critical role in translating favorable perceptions into supportive, proactive future actions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Central Asian Studies
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52536/3006-807x.2026-2.004
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE FAMILIARITY–ACTION GAP: TRUST, YOUTH CONTACT, AND THE LIMITS OF U.S. SOFT POWER IN TAJIKISTAN

Roselyn Bi
Journal of Central Asian Studies
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
article

THE FAMILIARITY–ACTION GAP: TRUST, YOUTH CONTACT, AND THE LIMITS OF U.S. SOFT POWER IN TAJIKISTAN

Roselyn Bi
article en

Abstract

This article examines how different mechanisms of U.S. soft power, particularly direct interpersonal contact and media exposure, shape Afghan and Tajik youths’ perceptions, trust, and intended engagement with the United States and international organizations. Using the first pilot survey collected from Afghan and Tajik youth residing in Tajikistan, the study quantitatively maps the relationships among youths’ perceptions, trust, and immediate and future actions. The findings indicate that trust is more strongly associated with intended future action than favorability alone, and that perception and trust are not significantly correlated. Direct interpersonal contact is more consistently linked to higher-commitment behavioral intentions than media exposure, which is more closely associated with familiarity and affective responses. These findings suggest the presence of a “Familiarity–Action Gap,” in which positive perceptions do not necessarily translate into active engagement. The objectives of this study are: (1) to examine how direct contact and media exposure relate to youth perceptions and trust, and (2) to test associations between perceptions, trust, and intended future actions. The study highlights the importance of trust-building mechanisms in contested soft power environments and suggests that interpersonal contact may play a critical role in translating favorable perceptions into supportive, proactive future actions.

Journal of Central Asian StudiesVol. 24(2)
University High School (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.