Partnerships for Public Health Emergency Preparedness: A Survey of US Health and Human Services Region 10 Local Health Departments

CONTEXT: Public health organizations and researchers recognize community engagement as a critical practice for promoting the health and well-being of communities, but gaps remain in our understanding of factors that contribute to the development and implementation of community partnerships related to public health emergency preparedness (PHEP), particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To assess contextual factors that are associated with PHEP community engagement among local health departments (LHDs). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: Health and Human Services (HHS) Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington). PARTICIPANTS: PHEP practitioners who work at LHD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We developed a novel Community Engagement Scale (CES) to measure the level of community engagement activities among each LHD and adapted the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) to measure participants' commitment to community partnerships in PHEP. RESULTS: LHDs 34% (n = 26) within Health and Human Services Region 10 responded to our survey, including 17 from Washington, 4 from Oregon, and 3 from Idaho. Participants had a mean of 4.9-year experience in PHEP. The mean Community Engagement Scale score was 13.4 out of 32, with a higher score indicating a greater number and frequency of community engagement activities. The mean Implementation Leadership Scale score was 30.1 out of 48, with a higher score indicating greater participant commitment to PHEP community engagement. The state in which the LHD is located was associated with community engagement activities and individual-level commitment to community partnerships. Individual years of experience in PHEP was associated with individual-level commitment to community partnerships. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a baseline assessment of engagement and partnership activities among LHDs in Region 10 using novel measures. Experience in PHEP and participants' commitment to PHEP community engagement were associated with partnership activities. Additional research is needed to uncover the state-level differences in community engagement activities and commitment to partnerships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000002384
Primary Topic
Disaster Response and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partnerships for Public Health Emergency Preparedness: A Survey of US Health and Human Services Region 10 Local Health Departments

Ashley Moore, Nicole A. Errett, Resham Patel, Francisca N. Santana et al.
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Disaster Response and Management
article

Partnerships for Public Health Emergency Preparedness: A Survey of US Health and Human Services Region 10 Local Health Departments

Ashley Moore, Nicole A. Errett, Resham Patel, Francisca N. Santana, Betty Bekemeier
article en

Abstract

CONTEXT: Public health organizations and researchers recognize community engagement as a critical practice for promoting the health and well-being of communities, but gaps remain in our understanding of factors that contribute to the development and implementation of community partnerships related to public health emergency preparedness (PHEP), particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To assess contextual factors that are associated with PHEP community engagement among local health departments (LHDs). DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: Health and Human Services (HHS) Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington). PARTICIPANTS: PHEP practitioners who work at LHD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We developed a novel Community Engagement Scale (CES) to measure the level of community engagement activities among each LHD and adapted the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) to measure participants' commitment to community partnerships in PHEP. RESULTS: LHDs 34% (n = 26) within Health and Human Services Region 10 responded to our survey, including 17 from Washington, 4 from Oregon, and 3 from Idaho. Participants had a mean of 4.9-year experience in PHEP. The mean Community Engagement Scale score was 13.4 out of 32, with a higher score indicating a greater number and frequency of community engagement activities. The mean Implementation Leadership Scale score was 30.1 out of 48, with a higher score indicating greater participant commitment to PHEP community engagement. The state in which the LHD is located was associated with community engagement activities and individual-level commitment to community partnerships. Individual years of experience in PHEP was associated with individual-level commitment to community partnerships. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a baseline assessment of engagement and partnership activities among LHDs in Region 10 using novel measures. Experience in PHEP and participants' commitment to PHEP community engagement were associated with partnership activities. Additional research is needed to uncover the state-level differences in community engagement activities and commitment to partnerships.

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Washington State Department of Health (US), University of Washington (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Disaster Response and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.