Workplace Allyship: An Integrative Review and Agenda for Future Research

ABSTRACT Workplace allyship has emerged as a key construct in the literature on diversity, equity, and inclusion. Although research on workplace allyship has expanded rapidly in recent years, advancement in this research stream is limited by conceptual ambiguity and fragmentation across numerous perspectives. In this integrative review, we address these limitations. First, we examine differences in how workplace allyship has been conceptualized in the workplace and develop three definitions reflecting key perspectives on workplace allyship: (1) engagement in workplace allyship by advantaged employees, (2) perceived workplace allyship by disadvantaged employees, and (3) the relational dynamics of workplace allyship between advantaged and disadvantaged employees. Second, we develop a conceptual model grounded in social identity theory and signaling theory that integrates these three perspectives. Third, based on this model, we synthesize and structure prior empirical research to develop an integrative framework of workplace allyship. Building on this framework, we propose a comprehensive agenda for future research. Overall, this review provides new insights into workplace allyship as a mechanism for creating and sustaining social equality within and beyond organizational boundaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.70104
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Workplace Allyship: An Integrative Review and Agenda for Future Research

Silja Hartmann, Alexander Newman, Maria Funk
Journal of Organizational Behavior
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Workplace Allyship: An Integrative Review and Agenda for Future Research

Silja Hartmann, Alexander Newman, Maria Funk
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Workplace allyship has emerged as a key construct in the literature on diversity, equity, and inclusion. Although research on workplace allyship has expanded rapidly in recent years, advancement in this research stream is limited by conceptual ambiguity and fragmentation across numerous perspectives. In this integrative review, we address these limitations. First, we examine differences in how workplace allyship has been conceptualized in the workplace and develop three definitions reflecting key perspectives on workplace allyship: (1) engagement in workplace allyship by advantaged employees, (2) perceived workplace allyship by disadvantaged employees, and (3) the relational dynamics of workplace allyship between advantaged and disadvantaged employees. Second, we develop a conceptual model grounded in social identity theory and signaling theory that integrates these three perspectives. Third, based on this model, we synthesize and structure prior empirical research to develop an integrative framework of workplace allyship. Building on this framework, we propose a comprehensive agenda for future research. Overall, this review provides new insights into workplace allyship as a mechanism for creating and sustaining social equality within and beyond organizational boundaries.

Journal of Organizational Behavior
The University of Melbourne (AU), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Berlin University Alliance
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.