Surgical Outcomes in Perforated vs. Non-Perforated Colon Cancer: A Comparative Retrospective Study

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant global health challenge, particularly because of its associated complications. Among these, tumor perforation is a critical event linked to increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the surgical outcomes of patients with perforated colon cancer versus those with non-perforated colon cancer. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted in the visceral surgery departments of Hassan II University Hospital in Fes, Morocco, including 198 patients who underwent surgical treatment for colon cancer between January 2014 and December 2022. Statistical analyses included descriptive assessments and comparative tests using the Chi-square and Student’s t-tests, with a p-value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 198 patients, 22 (11%) presented with perforated colon cancer. Laparotomy was the predominant surgical approach in the perforated group (86.4%), whereas laparoscopy was more frequently used in non-perforated cases (56.2%, p = 0.001). Stoma creation was significantly more common in perforated cases (72.7% vs. 4%, p < 0.001), with a notably higher rate of stoma closure failure in the perforated group (37.5% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were also more frequent in the perforated group (36.4% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.006), with higher rates of R2 resections (27.3% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001) and tumor recurrence (27.3% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.001). The mean hospital stay was significantly longer in patients with perforated cancer (11 days vs. 5 days, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This comparative study demonstrates that patients with perforated colon cancer are more likely to require a Hartmann’s procedure, to have prolonged intensive care unit stays, to experience higher rates of postoperative complications, to undergo R2 resections, and to have a greater incidence of tumor recurrence. A non-significant trend toward higher 30-day mortality was also observed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gastroenterology Insights
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent17030039
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surgical Outcomes in Perforated vs. Non-Perforated Colon Cancer: A Comparative Retrospective Study

Ait Taleb Khalid, Marghich Omar, Anis Tarek, El Bachir Benjelloun
Gastroenterology Insights
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Surgical Outcomes in Perforated vs. Non-Perforated Colon Cancer: A Comparative Retrospective Study

Ait Taleb Khalid, Marghich Omar, Anis Tarek, El Bachir Benjelloun
article en

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant global health challenge, particularly because of its associated complications. Among these, tumor perforation is a critical event linked to increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the surgical outcomes of patients with perforated colon cancer versus those with non-perforated colon cancer. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted in the visceral surgery departments of Hassan II University Hospital in Fes, Morocco, including 198 patients who underwent surgical treatment for colon cancer between January 2014 and December 2022. Statistical analyses included descriptive assessments and comparative tests using the Chi-square and Student’s t-tests, with a p-value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 198 patients, 22 (11%) presented with perforated colon cancer. Laparotomy was the predominant surgical approach in the perforated group (86.4%), whereas laparoscopy was more frequently used in non-perforated cases (56.2%, p = 0.001). Stoma creation was significantly more common in perforated cases (72.7% vs. 4%, p < 0.001), with a notably higher rate of stoma closure failure in the perforated group (37.5% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were also more frequent in the perforated group (36.4% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.006), with higher rates of R2 resections (27.3% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001) and tumor recurrence (27.3% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.001). The mean hospital stay was significantly longer in patients with perforated cancer (11 days vs. 5 days, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This comparative study demonstrates that patients with perforated colon cancer are more likely to require a Hartmann’s procedure, to have prolonged intensive care unit stays, to experience higher rates of postoperative complications, to undergo R2 resections, and to have a greater incidence of tumor recurrence. A non-significant trend toward higher 30-day mortality was also observed.

Gastroenterology InsightsVol. 17(3)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hassan II (MA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.