Local, spatial and land use variables, rather than forest cover, drive Odonata (Insecta) beta diversity in tropical streams

Abstract Changes in land use can lead to substantial reductions in forest cover, stream environmental quality, and biodiversity. Understanding how the conversion of natural environments into different land-use types affects species replacement and richness differences, the main components of beta diversity, is therefore essential for identifying the processes structuring biological communities under intense anthropogenic pressure. Here, we evaluated the effects of land-use change, forest cover, local environmental variables, and spatial structure on the taxonomic beta diversity of adult Odonata and tested whether beta diversity components differed among land-use categories (forest, cocoa, and pasture). The study was conducted in 50 streams in the eastern Amazon distributed across forested, cocoa, and pasture landscapes. Our results showed that species replacement was identified as the most important component of total beta diversity. The spatial structure and local environmental variables, particularly stream width, were the main determinants of total beta diversity, with greater stream width associated with greater variation in species composition. Large- and medium-scale spatial structures also played a key role in explaining total beta diversity, with distinct responses among the suborders. The land uses influenced only the composition of Odonata assemblages, primarily promoting species replacement. In contrast, forest cover did not significantly affect total beta diversity or its components. Despite the absence of direct effects of forest cover on beta diversity, maintaining forest cover around streams is crucial. This practice enhances habitat quality and supports species that depend on forest-associated environmental conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biodiversity and Conservation
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-026-03408-7
Primary Topic
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Local, spatial and land use variables, rather than forest cover, drive Odonata (Insecta) beta diversity in tropical streams

André Ribeiro Martins, G. S. Silva, Karina Dias‐Silva, Ana Caroline Leal Nascimento et al.
Biodiversity and Conservation
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
article

Local, spatial and land use variables, rather than forest cover, drive Odonata (Insecta) beta diversity in tropical streams

André Ribeiro Martins, G. S. Silva, Karina Dias‐Silva, Ana Caroline Leal Nascimento, Francieli de Fátima Bomfim, Adrielly Souza-Oliveira
article en

Abstract

Abstract Changes in land use can lead to substantial reductions in forest cover, stream environmental quality, and biodiversity. Understanding how the conversion of natural environments into different land-use types affects species replacement and richness differences, the main components of beta diversity, is therefore essential for identifying the processes structuring biological communities under intense anthropogenic pressure. Here, we evaluated the effects of land-use change, forest cover, local environmental variables, and spatial structure on the taxonomic beta diversity of adult Odonata and tested whether beta diversity components differed among land-use categories (forest, cocoa, and pasture). The study was conducted in 50 streams in the eastern Amazon distributed across forested, cocoa, and pasture landscapes. Our results showed that species replacement was identified as the most important component of total beta diversity. The spatial structure and local environmental variables, particularly stream width, were the main determinants of total beta diversity, with greater stream width associated with greater variation in species composition. Large- and medium-scale spatial structures also played a key role in explaining total beta diversity, with distinct responses among the suborders. The land uses influenced only the composition of Odonata assemblages, primarily promoting species replacement. In contrast, forest cover did not significantly affect total beta diversity or its components. Despite the absence of direct effects of forest cover on beta diversity, maintaining forest cover around streams is crucial. This practice enhances habitat quality and supports species that depend on forest-associated environmental conditions.

Biodiversity and ConservationVol. 35(8)
Universidade Federal do Pará (BR)
Universidade Federal do Pará
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.