Tobacco Use and Cessation Strategies Among Individuals Recently Diagnosed with Cancer

INTRODUCTION: Smoking cessation following a cancer diagnosis is critical for improving prognosis. For this reason, substantial efforts have been made to increase tobacco treatment in cancer care settings. The purpose of the present study is to provide an up-to-date estimate of tobacco/nicotine product use (inclusive of non-combustible products such as e-cigarettes and oral nicotine pouches) and cessation strategy uptake among individuals recently diagnosed with cancer. METHODS: Data were derived from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study, a large, nationally representative survey. Weighted frequencies estimated tobacco/nicotine product use (e.g., cigarettes, cigars, e-cigarettes, oral pouches) and cessation strategy prevalence (e.g., nicotine replacement therapies, prescription medications, e-cigarettes, oral pouches). Logistic regressions evaluated associations between cancer diagnosis and cancer type (e.g., tobacco related vs. non-tobacco related cancers) on tobacco use and cessation strategy outcomes. RESULTS: Individuals with cancer used tobacco/nicotine products at similar rates as those without cancer. Individuals with cancer were more likely to use evidence-based cessation strategies (e.g., pharmacotherapy and counseling; AOR=2.36 [95% CI 1.30-4.27], p<.01), but appeared less likely to successfully quit (17.27% [5.42-29.13]) with cancer quit vs 31.16% [28.39-33.93] without cancer). Similarly, those with tobacco-related cancers appeared to have higher engagement with cessation strategies (11.90% [5.95 - 17.84]) than those with non-tobacco-related cancers (2.35% [0.74 - 3.95]). CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to increase reach and access to evidence-based cessation support in cancer settings have been fruitful; however, more work is needed to improve treatment effectiveness. Continued monitoring of the use of non-combustible products is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntag145
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tobacco Use and Cessation Strategies Among Individuals Recently Diagnosed with Cancer

Amanda M. Palmer, Andrew A. Chen, Kinsey Pebley, Alana M. Rojewski et al.
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
article

Tobacco Use and Cessation Strategies Among Individuals Recently Diagnosed with Cancer

Amanda M. Palmer, Andrew A. Chen, Kinsey Pebley, Alana M. Rojewski, Tracy Smith
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Smoking cessation following a cancer diagnosis is critical for improving prognosis. For this reason, substantial efforts have been made to increase tobacco treatment in cancer care settings. The purpose of the present study is to provide an up-to-date estimate of tobacco/nicotine product use (inclusive of non-combustible products such as e-cigarettes and oral nicotine pouches) and cessation strategy uptake among individuals recently diagnosed with cancer. METHODS: Data were derived from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study, a large, nationally representative survey. Weighted frequencies estimated tobacco/nicotine product use (e.g., cigarettes, cigars, e-cigarettes, oral pouches) and cessation strategy prevalence (e.g., nicotine replacement therapies, prescription medications, e-cigarettes, oral pouches). Logistic regressions evaluated associations between cancer diagnosis and cancer type (e.g., tobacco related vs. non-tobacco related cancers) on tobacco use and cessation strategy outcomes. RESULTS: Individuals with cancer used tobacco/nicotine products at similar rates as those without cancer. Individuals with cancer were more likely to use evidence-based cessation strategies (e.g., pharmacotherapy and counseling; AOR=2.36 [95% CI 1.30-4.27], p<.01), but appeared less likely to successfully quit (17.27% [5.42-29.13]) with cancer quit vs 31.16% [28.39-33.93] without cancer). Similarly, those with tobacco-related cancers appeared to have higher engagement with cessation strategies (11.90% [5.95 - 17.84]) than those with non-tobacco-related cancers (2.35% [0.74 - 3.95]). CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to increase reach and access to evidence-based cessation support in cancer settings have been fruitful; however, more work is needed to improve treatment effectiveness. Continued monitoring of the use of non-combustible products is warranted.

Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Medical University of South Carolina (US), MUSC Hollings Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.