Beyond path dependence: a methodological review for studying regional futures

Regional development faces mounting challenges, including persistent inequalities, climate change and social fragmentation, that render regional futures increasingly complex and contested. Traditional approaches grounded in path dependence and structural analysis often overlook the role of imagination, agency and contested visions in shaping future trajectories, leaving a critical gap: the absence of forward-looking, inclusive and methodologically diverse tools to study and influence regional futures. This article presents a comparative review of eight methodological approaches that together constitute a pluralistic toolbox for studying regional futures. We organise these methods into three clusters evaluating each by purpose, techniques, data requirements and user suitability. Drawing on recent literature and empirical cases, we show how their integration reveals power dynamics, fosters agency and supports ethical, inclusive futures. We conclude with a call for critical reflexivity regarding the politics of knowledge production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regional Studies Regional Science
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2026.2686021
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond path dependence: a methodological review for studying regional futures

Suyash Jolly, Muzamil Farooq
Regional Studies Regional Science
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Beyond path dependence: a methodological review for studying regional futures

Suyash Jolly, Muzamil Farooq
article en

Abstract

Regional development faces mounting challenges, including persistent inequalities, climate change and social fragmentation, that render regional futures increasingly complex and contested. Traditional approaches grounded in path dependence and structural analysis often overlook the role of imagination, agency and contested visions in shaping future trajectories, leaving a critical gap: the absence of forward-looking, inclusive and methodologically diverse tools to study and influence regional futures. This article presents a comparative review of eight methodological approaches that together constitute a pluralistic toolbox for studying regional futures. We organise these methods into three clusters evaluating each by purpose, techniques, data requirements and user suitability. Drawing on recent literature and empirical cases, we show how their integration reveals power dynamics, fosters agency and supports ethical, inclusive futures. We conclude with a call for critical reflexivity regarding the politics of knowledge production.

Regional Studies Regional ScienceVol. 13(1)
University of Ostrava (CZ), University of Stavanger (NO)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.