Rebuilding Regulatory Trust, but How? Lessons From European Financial Regulation

ABSTRACT Over the past few decades, trust has emerged as a cornerstone of regulatory governance scholarship. Yet, despite a rise in regulatory crises and growing institutional contestation, we still know surprisingly little about how trust can be repaired once shattered. This article addresses this gap by developing a general analytical framework for regulatory trust repair, adapting insights from management scholarship to the context of regulation. The framework is then systematically tested through the particular case of European financial regulation—an unlikely case given the severity of the financial and eurozone crises, yet one in which a gradual pattern of recovery is documented. Through deductive theory‐testing process tracing, the analysis suggests that, even after catastrophic breakdowns, a combination of three mechanisms—public investigations providing a diagnosis of failure, substantive and institutional reforms reducing the risk of reoccurrence, and heightened transparency demonstrating renewed trustworthiness—can be jointly sufficient to repair trust in regulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulation & Governance
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70178
Primary Topic
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rebuilding Regulatory Trust, but How? Lessons From European Financial Regulation

Bernardo Rangoni
Regulation & Governance
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
article

Rebuilding Regulatory Trust, but How? Lessons From European Financial Regulation

Bernardo Rangoni
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Over the past few decades, trust has emerged as a cornerstone of regulatory governance scholarship. Yet, despite a rise in regulatory crises and growing institutional contestation, we still know surprisingly little about how trust can be repaired once shattered. This article addresses this gap by developing a general analytical framework for regulatory trust repair, adapting insights from management scholarship to the context of regulation. The framework is then systematically tested through the particular case of European financial regulation—an unlikely case given the severity of the financial and eurozone crises, yet one in which a gradual pattern of recovery is documented. Through deductive theory‐testing process tracing, the analysis suggests that, even after catastrophic breakdowns, a combination of three mechanisms—public investigations providing a diagnosis of failure, substantive and institutional reforms reducing the risk of reoccurrence, and heightened transparency demonstrating renewed trustworthiness—can be jointly sufficient to repair trust in regulation.

Regulation & Governance
University of Antwerp (BE), School of International Relations (IR), European University Institute (IT)
European Commission
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.