The role of community‐level institutions in smallholder land restoration

Abstract This review focuses on the role of community‐level institutions in the adoption of land restoration practices by smallholder farmers. Based on a systematic review of 72 peer‐reviewed articles from 33 low‐ and middle‐income countries, the review synthesizes recent empirical evidence on the various roles these institutions play in supporting smallholders. Four roles are highlighted: (1) collective action, (2) representation, (3) market services and (4) knowledge and skills. Community‐level institutions, ranging from formal farmer cooperatives to informal groups and semi‐formal lead farmer networks, can help address many of the knowledge, financial and labour constraints faced by smallholders. Improving the quality of extension services and increasing the capacity of community‐level institutions to provide market services for land restoration‐oriented agricultural practices are important priorities to create an enabling environment for the adoption of land restoration practices by smallholder farmers. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70383
Primary Topic
Land Rights and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of community‐level institutions in smallholder land restoration

Daniel Wiegant, Soumya Balasubramanya
People and Nature
Land Rights and Reforms
article

The role of community‐level institutions in smallholder land restoration

Daniel Wiegant, Soumya Balasubramanya
article en

Abstract

Abstract This review focuses on the role of community‐level institutions in the adoption of land restoration practices by smallholder farmers. Based on a systematic review of 72 peer‐reviewed articles from 33 low‐ and middle‐income countries, the review synthesizes recent empirical evidence on the various roles these institutions play in supporting smallholders. Four roles are highlighted: (1) collective action, (2) representation, (3) market services and (4) knowledge and skills. Community‐level institutions, ranging from formal farmer cooperatives to informal groups and semi‐formal lead farmer networks, can help address many of the knowledge, financial and labour constraints faced by smallholders. Improving the quality of extension services and increasing the capacity of community‐level institutions to provide market services for land restoration‐oriented agricultural practices are important priorities to create an enabling environment for the adoption of land restoration practices by smallholder farmers. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and Nature
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), World Bank (US), University of Waterloo (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Land Rights and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.