Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Cetuximab for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> In locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), rapid tumor progression during the preoperative waiting period is a critical concern. This study evaluated the clinical and pathological responses to neoadjuvant paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cetuximab (PCE) therapy used as a “bridging therapy” to ensure safe transition to surgery. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> This retrospective study included 22 patients with resectable locally advanced HNSCC treated with neoadjuvant PCE followed by radical surgery. Clinical response was assessed using RECIST v1.1, and pathological response was evaluated using the Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG) system. The correlation between radiological and pathological findings and their impact on survival [disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)] were analyzed. <h3>Results:</h3> The disease control rate was 100%, and the objective response rate was 41%. Pathological evaluation revealed TRG 1-2 in 10 patients and TRG 3-5 in 12 patients. There was no significant correlation between radiological response and pathological response (<i>p</i>=0.202); notably, 33.3% of radiological PR cases exhibited extensive residual disease (TRG 4). As the study was not powered to detect survival differences, survival analysis showed no significant differences in DFS or OS based on either radiological or pathological response (all <i>p</i>&gt;0.50). No surgical procedures were cancelled or delayed due to treatment-related toxicities. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> Neoadjuvant PCE therapy is a feasible and manageable bridge to surgery for locally advanced HNSCC, ensuring high surgical completion rates without compromising safety. However, a significant discordance exists between imaging and pathology, suggesting that radiological shrinkage should not be used as a rationale for surgical de-escalation. Radical resection should proceed according to the original tumor extent regardless of the clinical response to ensure oncological safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anticancer Research
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.18263
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Cetuximab for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Koji Tsukamoto, Michi Sawabe, Sho Iwaki, Hiroshi Tsuge et al.
Anticancer Research
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Cetuximab for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Koji Tsukamoto, Michi Sawabe, Sho Iwaki, Hiroshi Tsuge, Satsuki Nakano, Kiyoshi Minohara, Tomota Kamida, Sae Imaizumi, Takayuki Murase, Gaku Takano, Keiichiro Shingaki, DAISUKE KAWAKITA, TAKUMA MATOBA, SHINICHI IWASAKI
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> In locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), rapid tumor progression during the preoperative waiting period is a critical concern. This study evaluated the clinical and pathological responses to neoadjuvant paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cetuximab (PCE) therapy used as a “bridging therapy” to ensure safe transition to surgery. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> This retrospective study included 22 patients with resectable locally advanced HNSCC treated with neoadjuvant PCE followed by radical surgery. Clinical response was assessed using RECIST v1.1, and pathological response was evaluated using the Mandard tumor regression grade (TRG) system. The correlation between radiological and pathological findings and their impact on survival [disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)] were analyzed. <h3>Results:</h3> The disease control rate was 100%, and the objective response rate was 41%. Pathological evaluation revealed TRG 1-2 in 10 patients and TRG 3-5 in 12 patients. There was no significant correlation between radiological response and pathological response (<i>p</i>=0.202); notably, 33.3% of radiological PR cases exhibited extensive residual disease (TRG 4). As the study was not powered to detect survival differences, survival analysis showed no significant differences in DFS or OS based on either radiological or pathological response (all <i>p</i>&gt;0.50). No surgical procedures were cancelled or delayed due to treatment-related toxicities. <h3>Conclusion:</h3> Neoadjuvant PCE therapy is a feasible and manageable bridge to surgery for locally advanced HNSCC, ensuring high surgical completion rates without compromising safety. However, a significant discordance exists between imaging and pathology, suggesting that radiological shrinkage should not be used as a rationale for surgical de-escalation. Radical resection should proceed according to the original tumor extent regardless of the clinical response to ensure oncological safety.

Anticancer ResearchVol. 46(7)
Kyushu University (JP), Nagoya City University (JP), The Cancer Institute Hospital (JP), Toyota Kosei Hospital (JP), Nagoya Medical Center (JP), Kinan Hospital (JP), Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.