Retrieval of Chlorophyll-A Concentration via QA-Guided Adaptive Selection of Multiple Atmospheric Correction Algorithms

Atmospheric correction (AC) uncertainties critically constrain satellite chlorophyll-a (CHLA) retrieval in optically complex coastal waters. Existing AC algorithms perform divergently across water types, and no single algorithm is universally optimal. Although multi-source fusion has been widely explored, current studies predominantly integrate satellite sensors or inversion models while neglecting uncertainties inherent to the preprocessing AC step. In this study, we developed a pixel-wise AC optimization method using the QA score model to evaluate and select spectrally complementary outputs from multiple AC algorithms. Applied to GOCI data over the Shandong Peninsula, four algorithms (GDPS 1.3, GDPS 2.0, Seadas_Default, and Seadas_MUMM) were employed. For each pixel, the optimal remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) was selected based on QA scores, followed by CHLA retrieval via the YOC model. Validation against 96 in situ measurements demonstrated significantly improved accuracy (r = 0.868, RMSE = 0.582 μg/L, ε = 16.9%) compared with any single AC method. This study confirms that pixel-wise AC optimization and selection effectively suppress algorithm-specific uncertainties, providing a robust strategy for enhancing satellite-derived CHLA estimates in complex coastal waters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14131191
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retrieval of Chlorophyll-A Concentration via QA-Guided Adaptive Selection of Multiple Atmospheric Correction Algorithms

J. Zhang, Xiaoyan Liu, Q L Wang, Jiang Zi-ke et al.
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Marine and coastal ecosystems
article

Retrieval of Chlorophyll-A Concentration via QA-Guided Adaptive Selection of Multiple Atmospheric Correction Algorithms

J. Zhang, Xiaoyan Liu, Q L Wang, Jiang Zi-ke, Chen Xiao-jun, J Hu, Xiang-jun Zhou
article en

Abstract

Atmospheric correction (AC) uncertainties critically constrain satellite chlorophyll-a (CHLA) retrieval in optically complex coastal waters. Existing AC algorithms perform divergently across water types, and no single algorithm is universally optimal. Although multi-source fusion has been widely explored, current studies predominantly integrate satellite sensors or inversion models while neglecting uncertainties inherent to the preprocessing AC step. In this study, we developed a pixel-wise AC optimization method using the QA score model to evaluate and select spectrally complementary outputs from multiple AC algorithms. Applied to GOCI data over the Shandong Peninsula, four algorithms (GDPS 1.3, GDPS 2.0, Seadas_Default, and Seadas_MUMM) were employed. For each pixel, the optimal remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) was selected based on QA scores, followed by CHLA retrieval via the YOC model. Validation against 96 in situ measurements demonstrated significantly improved accuracy (r = 0.868, RMSE = 0.582 μg/L, ε = 16.9%) compared with any single AC method. This study confirms that pixel-wise AC optimization and selection effectively suppress algorithm-specific uncertainties, providing a robust strategy for enhancing satellite-derived CHLA estimates in complex coastal waters.

Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringVol. 14(13)
Qilu University of Technology (CN), Qingdao Academy of Intelligent Industries (CN), Institute of Oceanographic Instrumentation (CN), Shandong Academy of Sciences (CN), National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center (CN), Ocean University of China (CN), Weifang University (CN)
Department of Science and Technology of Shandong Province, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Marine and coastal ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.