Evaluation of admission-level clinical, laboratory, and vascular imaging predictors of prolonged length of stay in acute ischemic stroke

Background: Prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) adversely affects patient outcomes and strains healthcare resources. Previous studies have focused on clinical determinants but have rarely integrated admission-level laboratory and vascular imaging data with conventional variables.Methods: In this retrospective cohort of AIS patients admitted to a tertiary center between 2017 and 2024, prolonged LOS was defined as hospitalization ≥8 days. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate admission-level clinical, laboratory, and vascular imaging variables and the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification. Discrimination was assessed using a random forest. Pre-specified sensitivity analyses tested LOS quartiles, a survivor-only model, and calendar-period and pandemic effects.Results: Among 8,448 patients with AIS, 2,696 (31.9%) had prolonged LOS. Twelve admission-level variables and four TOAST subtypes were independent predictors. Positive predictors included initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.10), coronary heart disease (1.36), previous stroke (1.21), premorbid modified Rankin Scale score (1.08), white blood cell count (1.06), systolic blood pressure (1.03), initial glucose level (1.01), and relevant large-artery steno-occlusion (1.29); in contrast, hemoglobin level (0.95), triglyceride level (0.99), intravenous thrombolysis (0.79), and atrial fibrillation (0.82) showed inverse associations. In comparison with small-vessel occlusion, the other four TOAST subtypes showed prolonged LOS (large-artery atherosclerosis, 1.85; cardioembolism, 2.22; other determined, 2.67; undetermined, 1.78; p<0.001). Logistic regression (area under the curve, 0.736) and random forest (0.723) analyses performed comparably well (p=0.288). The findings persisted across LOS quartiles and survivor-only analysis (n=8,114); the calendar year showed no association (p=0.41), although the pandemic period (2020–2022) reduced the LOS (aOR, 0.89; p=0.028) with other predictors unchanged.Conclusion: Admission-level variables spanning clinical severity, medical history, vascular imaging, laboratory values, and stroke subtype were independently associated with prolonged LOS in patients with AIS and may inform risk stratification in acute stroke care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurocritical Care
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18700/jnc.260034
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of admission-level clinical, laboratory, and vascular imaging predictors of prolonged length of stay in acute ischemic stroke

Jun Yup Kim, Jihoon Kang, Moon‐Ku Han, Jung Hyun Park et al.
Journal of Neurocritical Care
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Evaluation of admission-level clinical, laboratory, and vascular imaging predictors of prolonged length of stay in acute ischemic stroke

Jun Yup Kim, Jihoon Kang, Moon‐Ku Han, Jung Hyun Park, Hee‐Joon Bae, Joo Hee Lee, Min-Surk Kye, Hyungchan Choi, Beom Joon Kim, Do Yeon Kim, Jonguk Kim, Baik Kyun Kim, Nakhoon Kim
article en

Abstract

Background: Prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) adversely affects patient outcomes and strains healthcare resources. Previous studies have focused on clinical determinants but have rarely integrated admission-level laboratory and vascular imaging data with conventional variables.Methods: In this retrospective cohort of AIS patients admitted to a tertiary center between 2017 and 2024, prolonged LOS was defined as hospitalization ≥8 days. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate admission-level clinical, laboratory, and vascular imaging variables and the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification. Discrimination was assessed using a random forest. Pre-specified sensitivity analyses tested LOS quartiles, a survivor-only model, and calendar-period and pandemic effects.Results: Among 8,448 patients with AIS, 2,696 (31.9%) had prolonged LOS. Twelve admission-level variables and four TOAST subtypes were independent predictors. Positive predictors included initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.10), coronary heart disease (1.36), previous stroke (1.21), premorbid modified Rankin Scale score (1.08), white blood cell count (1.06), systolic blood pressure (1.03), initial glucose level (1.01), and relevant large-artery steno-occlusion (1.29); in contrast, hemoglobin level (0.95), triglyceride level (0.99), intravenous thrombolysis (0.79), and atrial fibrillation (0.82) showed inverse associations. In comparison with small-vessel occlusion, the other four TOAST subtypes showed prolonged LOS (large-artery atherosclerosis, 1.85; cardioembolism, 2.22; other determined, 2.67; undetermined, 1.78; p<0.001). Logistic regression (area under the curve, 0.736) and random forest (0.723) analyses performed comparably well (p=0.288). The findings persisted across LOS quartiles and survivor-only analysis (n=8,114); the calendar year showed no association (p=0.41), although the pandemic period (2020–2022) reduced the LOS (aOR, 0.89; p=0.028) with other predictors unchanged.Conclusion: Admission-level variables spanning clinical severity, medical history, vascular imaging, laboratory values, and stroke subtype were independently associated with prolonged LOS in patients with AIS and may inform risk stratification in acute stroke care.

Journal of Neurocritical CareVol. 19(1)
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.