The Anticorruption Thought of Ho Chi Minh and Xi Jinping in the Socialist Political System

This article analyses and compares the anticorruption philosophies of two leaders, Ho Chi Minh and Xi Jinping, who represent two neighbouring countries with many similarities in political systems but differences in historical and economic contexts. The research aims to clarify the similarities and differences in the perspectives and methods of combating corruption employed by these two leaders. The main research methods include document analysis and philosophical comparison, drawing from historical sources, speeches and key policy documents. The findings indicate that while Ho Chi Minh focused on building revolutionary ethics, self-criticism and public supervision, Xi Jinping has employed robust legal measures, power supervision and international cooperation. This article clarifies the impact of these strategies on political development and social stability in Vietnam and China, and provides an insightful comparison of anticorruption approaches in modern socialist countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China Report
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455261457739
Primary Topic
Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Anticorruption Thought of Ho Chi Minh and Xi Jinping in the Socialist Political System

Nguyễn Anh Cường, Kiều Văn Nam
China Report
Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
article

The Anticorruption Thought of Ho Chi Minh and Xi Jinping in the Socialist Political System

Nguyễn Anh Cường, Kiều Văn Nam
article en

Abstract

This article analyses and compares the anticorruption philosophies of two leaders, Ho Chi Minh and Xi Jinping, who represent two neighbouring countries with many similarities in political systems but differences in historical and economic contexts. The research aims to clarify the similarities and differences in the perspectives and methods of combating corruption employed by these two leaders. The main research methods include document analysis and philosophical comparison, drawing from historical sources, speeches and key policy documents. The findings indicate that while Ho Chi Minh focused on building revolutionary ethics, self-criticism and public supervision, Xi Jinping has employed robust legal measures, power supervision and international cooperation. This article clarifies the impact of these strategies on political development and social stability in Vietnam and China, and provides an insightful comparison of anticorruption approaches in modern socialist countries.

China Report
FPT University (VN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.