Evaluating biodiversity and socio‐economic impacts of community‐led mangrove restoration: a case study from Kenya

Abstract Introduction Ongoing mangrove degradation has prompted restoration efforts to recover ecosystem services that support local livelihoods. Continued evaluation and learning are essential for adaptive management, yet studies rarely assess the combined biodiversity and social outcomes of restoration by integrating ecological monitoring with household‐level livelihood and perception data. Objectives We present insights from community‐led mangrove restoration in Kenya, evaluating biodiversity impacts of tree planting and community perceptions of mangroves and restoration. Methods We monitored 12 ecological metrics across a degradation gradient and conducted a survey of 383 local households. Results Vegetation metrics (canopy cover, aboveground biomass [AGB], diameter at breast height [DBH], tree density) showed clear trends across this degradation gradient, while invertebrate diversity and abundance did not. Previously restored sites were more similar to degraded than pristine sites, given the short time frame since planting (median 1.84 years, max 9 years). However, AGB, DBH, and tree density were significantly higher at older restoration sites, demonstrating the impact of restoration over time. Our household survey demonstrated community reliance on mangroves, with over half of respondents deriving greater than 25% of their income from mangrove‐dependent livelihoods (primarily fisheries). Over 90% of respondents reported improved quality of life from restoration, with 35 and 34% of restoration income used for education and food, respectively. Community members provided substantive recommendations, including forest patrols to prevent illegal logging, continued tree planting, and community education. Conclusions Our results reveal a temporal mismatch between biodiversity improvements and social benefits, highlighting the need for sustained investment in communities to maintain social benefits until ecosystem service gains from restoration become evident.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70477
Primary Topic
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating biodiversity and socio‐economic impacts of community‐led mangrove restoration: a case study from Kenya

Orion S. McCarthy, Stanley Nadir, Anthony Mbatha, Kevin Whilden et al.
Restoration Ecology
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
article

Evaluating biodiversity and socio‐economic impacts of community‐led mangrove restoration: a case study from Kenya

Orion S. McCarthy, Stanley Nadir, Anthony Mbatha, Kevin Whilden, Julius Sila, Kisilu Mary, Henry Komu, Michael Stewart, Leah Hays, Johnson Nzai, Edward Mwamuye, William Crosse, Erastus Kithi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Ongoing mangrove degradation has prompted restoration efforts to recover ecosystem services that support local livelihoods. Continued evaluation and learning are essential for adaptive management, yet studies rarely assess the combined biodiversity and social outcomes of restoration by integrating ecological monitoring with household‐level livelihood and perception data. Objectives We present insights from community‐led mangrove restoration in Kenya, evaluating biodiversity impacts of tree planting and community perceptions of mangroves and restoration. Methods We monitored 12 ecological metrics across a degradation gradient and conducted a survey of 383 local households. Results Vegetation metrics (canopy cover, aboveground biomass [AGB], diameter at breast height [DBH], tree density) showed clear trends across this degradation gradient, while invertebrate diversity and abundance did not. Previously restored sites were more similar to degraded than pristine sites, given the short time frame since planting (median 1.84 years, max 9 years). However, AGB, DBH, and tree density were significantly higher at older restoration sites, demonstrating the impact of restoration over time. Our household survey demonstrated community reliance on mangroves, with over half of respondents deriving greater than 25% of their income from mangrove‐dependent livelihoods (primarily fisheries). Over 90% of respondents reported improved quality of life from restoration, with 35 and 34% of restoration income used for education and food, respectively. Community members provided substantive recommendations, including forest patrols to prevent illegal logging, continued tree planting, and community education. Conclusions Our results reveal a temporal mismatch between biodiversity improvements and social benefits, highlighting the need for sustained investment in communities to maintain social benefits until ecosystem service gains from restoration become evident.

Restoration Ecology
Kabarak University (KE), American Pancreatic Association (US), African Conservation Centre (KE), Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KE), Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute (KE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.