Building collaborative governance from scratch: the significance of recalibration and reaffirmation in boundary work

This paper examines the dynamics of actors’ boundary work in collaborative governance. While widely studied, how actors navigate collaborative governance from its inception has been underexplored. Drawing on a longitudinal ethnographic study tracing actors’ struggles over boundaries in response to a collaboration mandate, this paper demonstrates (1) how the design (configurational boundary work) of collaborative governance inadvertently and sometimes adversely affects the collaboration; (2) how collaborative governance remains ‘under construction’ as actors switch between competitive and collaborative boundary work; and (3) how actors continually engage in ‘recalibration’ and ‘reaffirmation’ of boundary work in response to changing circumstances, tasks, and actors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Management Review
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2026.2690422
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building collaborative governance from scratch: the significance of recalibration and reaffirmation in boundary work

Sarah van Duijn, Sierk Ybema, Frans Kamsteeg
Public Management Review
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Building collaborative governance from scratch: the significance of recalibration and reaffirmation in boundary work

Sarah van Duijn, Sierk Ybema, Frans Kamsteeg
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the dynamics of actors’ boundary work in collaborative governance. While widely studied, how actors navigate collaborative governance from its inception has been underexplored. Drawing on a longitudinal ethnographic study tracing actors’ struggles over boundaries in response to a collaboration mandate, this paper demonstrates (1) how the design (configurational boundary work) of collaborative governance inadvertently and sometimes adversely affects the collaboration; (2) how collaborative governance remains ‘under construction’ as actors switch between competitive and collaborative boundary work; and (3) how actors continually engage in ‘recalibration’ and ‘reaffirmation’ of boundary work in response to changing circumstances, tasks, and actors.

Public Management Review
Anglia Ruskin University (GB), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.