Collaboration between two large language models for design concept generation

Abstract Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence, especially in large language models (LLMs), offer new opportunities to overcome the major challenges, such as human cognitive and creative limits, in design concept generation. Research results show that a well-trained LLM is able to generate design concepts as good as, or sometimes even better than, human designers. However, design concept generation using one LLM also suffers from several limitations, such as a lack of diversity and novelty in generated design concepts. It is well known that human collaboration in design concept generation drives higher quality and more original ideas by fostering serendipitous insights and diverse perspectives. However, it is not clear whether LLM collaboration can lead to similar outcomes and overcome the limitations of design concept generation by an individual LLM. This research assesses the effectiveness of collaboration between two LLMs in design concept generation through two design studies. Three representative LLMs are first employed to generate design concepts for two engineering design problems, and then they are asked to improve their own design concepts and the design concepts generated from the other two LLMs, respectively. The results of these studies indicate that the collaboration between two LLMs improves the novelty and variety of the initial design concepts generated by an individual LLM. Among all performance metrics evaluated, variety benefits the most from the LLM collaboration. These findings suggest that collaboration among LLMs can serve as an effective tool for concept generation in the early stage of product and system design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mechanical Design
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4072235
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaboration between two large language models for design concept generation

Guanglu Zhang, Daniel A. McAdams, Siyi Xiao
Journal of Mechanical Design
Design Education and Practice
article

Collaboration between two large language models for design concept generation

Guanglu Zhang, Daniel A. McAdams, Siyi Xiao
article en

Abstract

Abstract Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence, especially in large language models (LLMs), offer new opportunities to overcome the major challenges, such as human cognitive and creative limits, in design concept generation. Research results show that a well-trained LLM is able to generate design concepts as good as, or sometimes even better than, human designers. However, design concept generation using one LLM also suffers from several limitations, such as a lack of diversity and novelty in generated design concepts. It is well known that human collaboration in design concept generation drives higher quality and more original ideas by fostering serendipitous insights and diverse perspectives. However, it is not clear whether LLM collaboration can lead to similar outcomes and overcome the limitations of design concept generation by an individual LLM. This research assesses the effectiveness of collaboration between two LLMs in design concept generation through two design studies. Three representative LLMs are first employed to generate design concepts for two engineering design problems, and then they are asked to improve their own design concepts and the design concepts generated from the other two LLMs, respectively. The results of these studies indicate that the collaboration between two LLMs improves the novelty and variety of the initial design concepts generated by an individual LLM. Among all performance metrics evaluated, variety benefits the most from the LLM collaboration. These findings suggest that collaboration among LLMs can serve as an effective tool for concept generation in the early stage of product and system design.

Journal of Mechanical Design
College Station Medical Center (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.