Weekly and Biweekly Treatment With Bofanglutide Versus Semaglutide in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND: Bofanglutide is a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist under development for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and overweight and obesity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bofanglutide compared with semaglutide. DESIGN: Phase 2b, randomized, open-label, active-controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06256549). SETTING: Multicenter (37 sites in China). PARTICIPANTS: ], 7.0% to 11.0%). INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1:1 to 1 of 5 treatment groups: bofanglutide titrated to targets of 12, 18, or 24 mg (biweekly [once every 2 weeks; Q2W]); bofanglutide titrated to 24 mg (once weekly [QW]); or semaglutide titrated to 1 mg QW. MEASUREMENTS: level from baseline to week 24 (primary end point), secondary efficacy end points, and safety. RESULTS: level change from baseline was -1.87% (95% CI, -2.11% to -1.63%), -2.28% (CI, -2.54% to -2.03%), and -1.94% (CI, -2.19% to -1.69%) for bofanglutide 12, 18, 24 mg Q2W, respectively; -2.32% (CI, -2.57% to -2.06%) for bofanglutide 24 mg QW; and -1.60% (CI, -1.85% to -1.35%) for 1 mg of semaglutide QW. Corresponding treatment differences versus semaglutide were -0.27% (CI, -0.61% to -0.08%), -0.68% (CI, -1.04% to -0.33%), -0.34% (CI, -0.70% to 0.02%), and -0.72% (CI, -1.08% to -0.36%), respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse events (GIAEs) (mostly grade 1 or 2 in severity) occurred in 81.8% to 87.3% and 51.9% of participants in the bofanglutide and semaglutide groups, respectively. Hypoglycemia occurred in 0% to 3.8% versus 1.9%, with no severe hypoglycemia. LIMITATION: Open-label, short duration, only Chinese participants. CONCLUSION: levels were seen with bofanglutide in patients with T2DM; GIAEs were the most common and generally manageable. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7326/annals-25-04623
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weekly and Biweekly Treatment With Bofanglutide Versus Semaglutide in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Anshun He, Yue Li, Wei Chen, Ming Rong Liu et al.
Annals of Internal Medicine
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Weekly and Biweekly Treatment With Bofanglutide Versus Semaglutide in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Anshun He, Yue Li, Wei Chen, Ming Rong Liu, Lu Li, Jingyu Liu, Su Wang, Jinling Liu, Yueyue Zheng, Tian Xie, Z F Cheng, Hanqing Cai, Helena W. Rodbard, Wei Yang, Jing Zhao
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bofanglutide is a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist under development for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and overweight and obesity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bofanglutide compared with semaglutide. DESIGN: Phase 2b, randomized, open-label, active-controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06256549). SETTING: Multicenter (37 sites in China). PARTICIPANTS: ], 7.0% to 11.0%). INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1:1 to 1 of 5 treatment groups: bofanglutide titrated to targets of 12, 18, or 24 mg (biweekly [once every 2 weeks; Q2W]); bofanglutide titrated to 24 mg (once weekly [QW]); or semaglutide titrated to 1 mg QW. MEASUREMENTS: level from baseline to week 24 (primary end point), secondary efficacy end points, and safety. RESULTS: level change from baseline was -1.87% (95% CI, -2.11% to -1.63%), -2.28% (CI, -2.54% to -2.03%), and -1.94% (CI, -2.19% to -1.69%) for bofanglutide 12, 18, 24 mg Q2W, respectively; -2.32% (CI, -2.57% to -2.06%) for bofanglutide 24 mg QW; and -1.60% (CI, -1.85% to -1.35%) for 1 mg of semaglutide QW. Corresponding treatment differences versus semaglutide were -0.27% (CI, -0.61% to -0.08%), -0.68% (CI, -1.04% to -0.33%), -0.34% (CI, -0.70% to 0.02%), and -0.72% (CI, -1.08% to -0.36%), respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse events (GIAEs) (mostly grade 1 or 2 in severity) occurred in 81.8% to 87.3% and 51.9% of participants in the bofanglutide and semaglutide groups, respectively. Hypoglycemia occurred in 0% to 3.8% versus 1.9%, with no severe hypoglycemia. LIMITATION: Open-label, short duration, only Chinese participants. CONCLUSION: levels were seen with bofanglutide in patients with T2DM; GIAEs were the most common and generally manageable. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals.

Annals of Internal Medicine
Harbin Medical University (CN), Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (CN), Zaozhuang Municipal Hospital (CN), Fifth Tianjin Central Hospital (CN), Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (CN), Clinical Research Consultants (United States) (US), Nanyang Medical College (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University (CN), Lee's Pharmaceutical (China) (CN), Seventh People's Hospital of Shanghai (CN), Weifang Chinese Medicine Hospital (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.