Comparison of neutralization and disinfection kinetics in povidone iodine‐ and hydrogen peroxide‐based soft contact lens care solutions

PURPOSE: To assess and compare the time-dependent disinfection efficacy against standard microbial strains and the neutralization kinetics of two commercially available soft contact lens care systems, one based on 0.05% povidone iodine and one based on 3.42% hydrogen peroxide. METHODS: To assess neutralization kinetics of each system, the concentration of the active disinfectants was quantified via iodometric titration (hydrogen peroxide) and high-performance liquid chromatography (povidone iodine) at intervals from 0.5 min to the minimum recommended disinfection time (MRDT). Disinfecting efficacy against the five ISO 14729 microbial strains (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, Fusarium solani) was assessed at intervals from 0.5 min to each system's respective MRDT. Microbial log reductions and disinfection rates were calculated using standard plate count methods. Statistical significance between systems was determined using ANOVA and post-hoc comparisons (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The povidone iodine system reached a peak concentration (∼0.05%) within 2 min, maintained this level for 5 min, and was neutralized by 20 min. Despite rapid neutralization, povidone iodine exceeded the standardized criteria for all strains within 1 min and disinfected below the detectable limit within 5 min. Conversely, the hydrogen peroxide system's concentration began declining immediately and fell below 1% within 30 min, before disinfection was complete for three strains. Significant kinetic differences (p < 0.05) favored povidone iodine across four strains, most notably against S. aureus, where hydrogen peroxide lagged by several hours. CONCLUSIONS: This study possesses a conflict of interest, and external validation is encouraged. The povidone iodine system achieved remarkably rapid disinfection across all strains at a 5000-fold lower molar concentration than the hydrogen peroxide system, well below the ocular irritation threshold. Povidone iodine's consistent, rapid disinfection, along with its high safety profile, suggests it may be a more optimal care option than the current gold standard.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Optometry and Vision Science
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ovs2.70085
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of neutralization and disinfection kinetics in povidone iodine‐ and hydrogen peroxide‐based soft contact lens care solutions

Katsuhide Yamasaki, Fumio Saitoh, Haruki Nakagawa, C Bähr et al.
Optometry and Vision Science
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
article

Comparison of neutralization and disinfection kinetics in povidone iodine‐ and hydrogen peroxide‐based soft contact lens care solutions

Katsuhide Yamasaki, Fumio Saitoh, Haruki Nakagawa, C Bähr, Kazuhiro Sasanuma, M. Kitamura
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess and compare the time-dependent disinfection efficacy against standard microbial strains and the neutralization kinetics of two commercially available soft contact lens care systems, one based on 0.05% povidone iodine and one based on 3.42% hydrogen peroxide. METHODS: To assess neutralization kinetics of each system, the concentration of the active disinfectants was quantified via iodometric titration (hydrogen peroxide) and high-performance liquid chromatography (povidone iodine) at intervals from 0.5 min to the minimum recommended disinfection time (MRDT). Disinfecting efficacy against the five ISO 14729 microbial strains (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, Fusarium solani) was assessed at intervals from 0.5 min to each system's respective MRDT. Microbial log reductions and disinfection rates were calculated using standard plate count methods. Statistical significance between systems was determined using ANOVA and post-hoc comparisons (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The povidone iodine system reached a peak concentration (∼0.05%) within 2 min, maintained this level for 5 min, and was neutralized by 20 min. Despite rapid neutralization, povidone iodine exceeded the standardized criteria for all strains within 1 min and disinfected below the detectable limit within 5 min. Conversely, the hydrogen peroxide system's concentration began declining immediately and fell below 1% within 30 min, before disinfection was complete for three strains. Significant kinetic differences (p < 0.05) favored povidone iodine across four strains, most notably against S. aureus, where hydrogen peroxide lagged by several hours. CONCLUSIONS: This study possesses a conflict of interest, and external validation is encouraged. The povidone iodine system achieved remarkably rapid disinfection across all strains at a 5000-fold lower molar concentration than the hydrogen peroxide system, well below the ocular irritation threshold. Povidone iodine's consistent, rapid disinfection, along with its high safety profile, suggests it may be a more optimal care option than the current gold standard.

Optometry and Vision ScienceVol. 103(7)
Hyogo Social Welfare Corporation (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.