Learning in a noisy world: How lucky successes and unlucky failures shape learning consequences

Learning is noisy. People can face unlucky failure, in which they fail despite using effective strategies, or experience lucky success, in which they succeed in spite of using suboptimal strategies. Both situations can serve as potentially valuable learning opportunities, as long as performance outcomes are interpreted accurately. This report examines people's ability to recognize and adjust for these errors during the learning process. Our pilot data demonstrated that people assumed that noise affected failure at greater rates, and thereby believed successful outcomes were more informative learning cues. Based on these findings, our research aims to investigate whether experiencing a lucky success is more detrimental to future learning than experiencing unlucky failure, especially when it occurs at the beginning of a learning process. In other words, we seek to understand whether learners sufficiently discount the role of noise in successful outcomes or place too much weight on the informative value of their success, thereby hindering their learning when these outcomes are noisy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0352416
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning in a noisy world: How lucky successes and unlucky failures shape learning consequences

Martha Jeong, Michele Rigolizzo, Amanda Zaidan Chen
PLoS ONE
Memory Processes and Influences
article

Learning in a noisy world: How lucky successes and unlucky failures shape learning consequences

Martha Jeong, Michele Rigolizzo, Amanda Zaidan Chen
article en

Abstract

Learning is noisy. People can face unlucky failure, in which they fail despite using effective strategies, or experience lucky success, in which they succeed in spite of using suboptimal strategies. Both situations can serve as potentially valuable learning opportunities, as long as performance outcomes are interpreted accurately. This report examines people's ability to recognize and adjust for these errors during the learning process. Our pilot data demonstrated that people assumed that noise affected failure at greater rates, and thereby believed successful outcomes were more informative learning cues. Based on these findings, our research aims to investigate whether experiencing a lucky success is more detrimental to future learning than experiencing unlucky failure, especially when it occurs at the beginning of a learning process. In other words, we seek to understand whether learners sufficiently discount the role of noise in successful outcomes or place too much weight on the informative value of their success, thereby hindering their learning when these outcomes are noisy.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(6)
Montclair State University (US), Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Learning in a noisy world: How lucky successes and unlucky failures shape learning consequences — Martha Jeong, Michele Rigolizzo, et al. · PLoS ONE (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS