The archetypal ecocide: is environmental devastation in the Alberta oil sands an international crime?

The Alberta oil sands operations have long been referred to as ‘ecocidal’ in view of the environmental devastation they cause. Yet the oil sands operations continue to grow, with the rewards, risks and damages provoking polarised reactions. Government and corporate industry sources highlight the oil sands as ‘an immense economic driver’ and ‘a secure source of energy for the world’. Critics, including many Indigenous peoples in the region, protest the severe environmental destruction wrought by the extractive operations as criminal acts of ‘ecocide’. In this article, we apply the contemporary proposed definition of the international crime of ecocide to the Alberta oil sands operations. While there has been a wealth of comment on this definition of the crime, there are fewer attempts to apply it to real life examples of environmental destruction. This article builds on this work, using a detailed application of the proposed definition to the oil sands operations both to highlight the ecological devastation they cause and to explore some of the definition’s nuances, revealing areas which may need more thought.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Human Rights
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2026.2675336
Primary Topic
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The archetypal ecocide: is environmental devastation in the Alberta oil sands an international crime?

Kate Mackintosh, Lisa Oldring
The International Journal of Human Rights
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
article

The archetypal ecocide: is environmental devastation in the Alberta oil sands an international crime?

Kate Mackintosh, Lisa Oldring
article en

Abstract

The Alberta oil sands operations have long been referred to as ‘ecocidal’ in view of the environmental devastation they cause. Yet the oil sands operations continue to grow, with the rewards, risks and damages provoking polarised reactions. Government and corporate industry sources highlight the oil sands as ‘an immense economic driver’ and ‘a secure source of energy for the world’. Critics, including many Indigenous peoples in the region, protest the severe environmental destruction wrought by the extractive operations as criminal acts of ‘ecocide’. In this article, we apply the contemporary proposed definition of the international crime of ecocide to the Alberta oil sands operations. While there has been a wealth of comment on this definition of the crime, there are fewer attempts to apply it to real life examples of environmental destruction. This article builds on this work, using a detailed application of the proposed definition to the oil sands operations both to highlight the ecological devastation they cause and to explore some of the definition’s nuances, revealing areas which may need more thought.

The International Journal of Human Rights
Australian Human Rights Commission (AU), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.